Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or so as best I recall?) On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" wrote: > I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23. > > I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding > /etc/init.d/sqm restart > > input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm > > rebooted > > and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far. > > > On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote: > > A race condition appears to have crept in... > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Dave Taht" > Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM > Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated? > To: "Richard E. Brown" > Cc: > > Probably didn't start sqm properly > > Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart > > tc -s qdisc show dev ge00 > > Should show htb and fq codel. > On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" wrote: > >> So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware in my >> primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked well as a secondary, >> so I figured, What the heck… Let’s give it try. >> >> The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM page, chose >> the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and link layer to ATM with no >> additional overhead for my DSL link. >> >> Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I fired up >> speedtest.net, they jumped to 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I >> should look at before reverting? Thanks. >> >> Rich >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing listCerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.nethttps://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > >