From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B40921F0FA for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x55so8380201wes.40 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:15:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=732nqyxmODk8NPwKtWzDkI0lRmtGo3jPa8EY35lnLvQ=; b=MDIzMpFayJVEJUO8xiu0gWLasCGrOs3i5Z7a12XKnjL8Vl8DCjvyacv4VFo5Cc3LOH X1Hnf1H0mz2ViJPffrJHjwu3b9KlvY7+ludvxeUC8FDJ9Cld/xcIC4J/74gW3R5wwrR4 Yt/Ff7UU7onKhQo71j0wV103MhxHTM/z5BtkFb3/uPdmV9fkTQ9mGliNj8lQJljZYT2n UP1iWPqDx9AXmhbyJJrvVbXKhJbJse6JgSZ/BSF+zQHB+HvLgbfQiea6FKZM4MGJXn72 WIXoLgT20yMEvPoL6jWzYrwzINZVGSCurKSLWz7Ah2F4KnSGC+EWiXRxEXptLU9o+kiv 2+hA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.76.42 with SMTP id h10mr21154930wiw.46.1388171703755; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:15:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:15:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:15:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52BDD08F.2000904@imap.cc> References: <571C0EE5-DC15-4A9C-A195-A97F93A335EB@gmail.com> <52BDD08F.2000904@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:15:03 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Fred Stratton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043890d34a2b2b04ee88e91c Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Re: CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 19:15:06 -0000 --f46d043890d34a2b2b04ee88e91c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or so as best I recall?) On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" wrote: > I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23. > > I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding > /etc/init.d/sqm restart > > input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm > > rebooted > > and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far. > > > On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote: > > A race condition appears to have crept in... > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Dave Taht" > Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM > Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated? > To: "Richard E. Brown" > Cc: > > Probably didn't start sqm properly > > Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart > > tc -s qdisc show dev ge00 > > Should show htb and fq codel. > On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" wrote: > >> So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware in my >> primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked well as a seconda= ry, >> so I figured, What the heck=85 Let=92s give it try. >> >> The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM page, chose >> the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and link layer to ATM with no >> additional overhead for my DSL link. >> >> Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I fired up >> speedtest.net, they jumped to 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I >> should look at before reverting? Thanks. >> >> Rich >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing listCerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.nethttps://list= s.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > --f46d043890d34a2b2b04ee88e91c Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest= you try fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit = or so as best I recall?)

On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton&qu= ot; <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23.

I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding
/etc/init.d/sqm restart

input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm

rebooted

and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far.


On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote:

A race condition appears to have crept in...

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
To: "Richard E. Brown" <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Cc:

Probably didn't start sqm properly

Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart

tc -s qdisc show dev ge00

Should show htb and fq codel.

On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Bro= wn" <= richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware in my primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked well as a secondary, so I figured, What the heck=85 Let=92s give it try.

The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM page, chose the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and link layer to ATM with no additional overhead for my DSL link.

Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I fired up spe= edtest.net, they jumped to 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I should look at before reverting? Thanks.

Rich
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Ce=
rowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--f46d043890d34a2b2b04ee88e91c--