On 08/09/13 23:23, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I posted this contribution to OpenWRT but it has been ignored for almost
>> 12 months:
>>
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-September/016771.html
>>
>> I've tried asio on OpenWRT and it seems to work fine, I've submitted a
>> patch for it.  Would it be possible to bring this directly into CeroWRT?
>
> We maintain a packages repo (ceropackages-3.3) for various bits of interesting
> stuff.
>
> Certainly a decent stun/turn server in the webrtc world would be "interesting"

The underlying asio library itself is general purpose - so it is not
just for STUN/TURN.  TURN is very compelling now that WebRTC is taking
off and uses TURN by default from the browser.

To give another example, asio has been used as a foundation for the
websocketpp suite, which enables both client and server websocket
development

> It's not clear to me what else asio is - and if it is "decent enough"?

> In general I am allergic to c++/boost stuff in tiny embedded systems - we have
> only so much flash and ram to spare. What are the flash and memory impacts?

asio itself is a header library for asynchronous, event-based programming

It comes in a boost version and a non-boost version.  This is the
non-boost version, so it is likely to have less impact than the boost
version.  I confess the full solution with SIP + TURN + SSL is a little
top heavy though, a device with 32MB RAM may not be enough, my WL-1043ND
couldn't handle it all.  On the other hand, one of these jumbo routers
(I went and got a Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H with 128MB RAM) is quite
suitable and can run a full WebRTC stack as a convenient alternative to
Skype.

Here is a trivial asio example:

http://think-async.com/Asio/asio-1.4.8/src/examples/echo/async_tcp_echo_server.cpp

> Anyway, if you want to package it up I'll gladly fold it into ceropackages,
> and build it, where more can fiddle with it.

I've made up a patch against OpenWRT, to bring this into ceropackages do
I need to adapt the patch or you can easily use it as is?  Please find
the Makefile attached.





_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel