From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B705121F1B6 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:43:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w61so13993641wes.14 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:43:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4g2WaFYjofVK3LnCrT3Vx6vFt06SwWGJ3Vo5yIa4h78=; b=V/7MvW2J5aJhvUeibgaojOxYL5iXlv3T1uHpuWk4mXUSdgOSwHyBmaemTFK0nmhqJf NuzMAPdygZL+1+Jzr28RozeVeWoJfJL6jnXwQ+rKbIa1Y9sx7MRtM0IiDTruMHBXNERB bLa0wP80Cdxin862ieCJfIfTfy16XbCm5klYPgMYED0Rw6vf52zG1JwxEc4XKtQ7Rd13 Nqt4anKtfci6lvWG3+tpj0C9PdyVn2S2w7IfcYsvPJitLZHiP9194O+8tLhB1GW0Qn88 XLZTToXmaRhLP6jOBp0xk21h/HfbnG7p0bs8DKrKbHEYhe1K/VrF+nzWsVvh891NIN6b CTqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.75.198 with SMTP id e6mr2648226wjw.3.1388774594562; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:43:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:43:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52C6FE3C.6020207@openwrt.org> References: <52C6FE3C.6020207@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:43:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Steven Barth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Matt Mathis , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 6relayd X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 18:43:24 -0000 cb.list, please put https://raw.github.com/dtaht/cerowrt-next/master/package/network/ipv6/6rela= yd/files/6relayd.init into /etc/init.d/6relayd and see what happens. On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Steven Barth wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't really touched 6relayd since October so not sure what is wrong > atm. > There was a problem with its init script recently due to some shell scrip= t > change in OpenWrt which I hopefully fixed yesterday (couldn't verify the > issue or fix yet though). I was also experiencing a race condition with dnsmasq, while I had it enabl= ing ra and dhcpv6 via dnsmasq. At the moment that's turned off by default, but I did rather prefer having dns names for my ipv6 addresses... is there a good way for 6relayd and dnsmasq-dhcpv6 to co-exist? > Feel free to provide me with some debugging information of the system whi= le > PD fails for you so I can have a look at the probable cause: > > * "ifstatus ge00" (replace ge00 with your IPv6 upstream interface) > * "ip addr list dev ge01" (replace ge01 with the interface your downstrea= m > router is connected) > * "ps | grep 6relayd" > > Anyway I will migrate all the stuff to odhcpd soon (it's successor which > shares a good part of the codebase but is a bit better integrated with th= e > rest of the environment). same question re dnsmasq. > > > Regards, > > Steven > > > > On 03.01.2014 18:31, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, cb.list6 wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >>>> >>>> At one level I am happy to figure out this is a recently introduced bu= g. >>>> >>>> On the other hand I am not sure if it is 6relayd. >>>> >>>> What version of cero was working for you? >>> >>> >>> I am not entirely sure, but i think it was from September. >>> >>> CB >> >> At the moment I lack the ability to debug the breakage in ipv6 dhcp-pd >> (which is odhcpd) (I am travelling). >> >> I will on my next stop next week (tuesday) setup a dhcpv6pd server and >> see what I can see. >> >>>> On Jan 3, 2014 12:21 AM, "cb.list6" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have been using CeroWRT on Comcast with a 3800 for about 6 month. >>>>> The >>>>> DHCP-PD config has always been a little unstable for me, but working. >>>>> >>>>> I recently upgraded to: >>>>> >>>>> root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a >>>>> Linux cerowrt 3.10.24 #1 Tue Dec 24 10:50:15 PST 2013 mips GNU/Linux >>>>> >>>>> My WAN gets a /128, but i cannot get DHCP-PD to work to get addresses >>>>> on >>>>> the rest of my interfaces. The router does seem to have good IPv6 >>>>> access. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I fiddled with the 6relayd config and came up with this, but it does >>>>> not >>>>> work. Any pointers on how to get this back on track? The result of >>>>> the >>>>> below config is that the /128 from the WAN interfaces is now present = on >>>>> all >>>>> the interfaces but my attached computers get no addresses. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> config server 'default' >>>>> option rd 'server' >>>>> option dhcpv6 'server' >>>>> option management_level '1' >>>>> list network 'ge01' >>>>> list network 'gw00' >>>>> list network 'gw01' >>>>> list network 'gw10' >>>>> list network 'gw11' >>>>> list network 'se00' >>>>> list network 'sw00' >>>>> list network 'sw10' >>>>> option fallback_relay 'rd dhcpv6 ndp' >>>>> option master 'ge00' >>>>> >>>>> root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>>>> >> >> > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html