From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] shaperprobe tests
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 05:50:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7AnZq5ocynifOcH1S1fMwS=G2x9GdeDf-LQKHWXxvmng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I am pleased to see mlabs has a server up for collections. Given that
there was other traffic on this link the results aren't too wildly
inaccurate.
I do find it amusing that it doesn't detect a shaper on any of my tests so far.
Recently I did a whole bunch of interesting traces with stuart
cheshire and you CAN detect a clear pattern for the inverse sqrt of
codel on a nearly idle link. I haven't looked at the guts of
shaperprobe since I saw it at gatech, but perhaps it's possible to
leverage it further in cero than has ever been done before and make it
more accurate. I sure hope that nobody's writing papers on the results
today...
I would be very interested on other people's results with and without
sqm enabled using shaperprobe. Current code and binaries for major
operating systems are at:
http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/shaperprobe
The one that is in cerowrt is 3 years out of date. Fixing that, but
for now running code from my x86 box:
I set my connection to 800 down and 220 up with nfq_codel.
d@k1:~/Downloads/shaperprobe$ ./prober
DiffProbe release. January 2012.
Shaper Detection Module.
Connected to server XX.YY.ZZ.QQ
Estimating capacity:
Upstream: 138 Kbps.
Downstream: 750 Kbps.
The measurement will last for about 2.5 minutes. Please wait.
Checking for traffic shapers:
Upstream: No shaper detected.
Median received rate: 112 Kbps.
Downstream: No shaper detected.
Median received rate: 746 Kbps.
For more information, visit: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~partha/diffprobe
Then I did fq_codel for 25Mbit down, 4up
d@k1:~/Downloads/shaperprobe$ ./prober
DiffProbe release. January 2012.
Shaper Detection Module.
Connected to server XX.YY.ZZ.QQ
Estimating capacity:
Upstream: 3548 Kbps.
Downstream: 19125 Kbps.
The measurement will last for about 2.5 minutes. Please wait.
Checking for traffic shapers:
Upstream: No shaper detected.
Median received rate: 3472 Kbps.
Downstream: No shaper detected.
Median received rate: 18741 Kbps.
Then, for giggles, on an unshaped cable modem (which is roughly 25
down and 5 up with powerboost enabled, I think....)
Estimating capacity:
Upstream: 4794 Kbps.
Downstream: 96663 Kbps. # WTF?
The measurement will last for about 3.0 minutes. Please wait.
Checking for traffic shapers:
Upstream: No shaper detected.
Median received rate: 4666 Kbps.
Downstream: No shaper detected.
Median received rate: 28186 Kbps. # powerboost probably
It's choosing different servers for each of these tests so I would
expect that to be part of the issues, too.
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
reply other threads:[~2013-12-29 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw7AnZq5ocynifOcH1S1fMwS=G2x9GdeDf-LQKHWXxvmng@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox