From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51813B2A4 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 01:29:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id z9so13706609ilb.4 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:29:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+f7PAtemGEodBFyIWJUjjhDk1POQgMBjcqlORbigBI=; b=Ou0JOgGFiejwFDuq1rc48Bo8S2CkRJfJy33EF/9IJJNaRPciRffFalm4XKZ6kJ+Hnc h8I6lUw5pyMUDcwqdtEm7/0DX057L7srIRkgoJG4LKxp+qOFWHwGkUsuvQaXAzGKMyJq 5LwMzAUqpVtJDovTM0b4zYl+UplhJPhWcEoTqUAjj5YbO9FXZHwTV8g+PFyF2c2bma/z YJT94es+c6s4uE+lKfQNeZw5LnDPxOEsgta0IDkiUSlduGNUNUbG3DhPj715vEc5vKGe s9/nCHR4n+sOFXUbg919lNEa5nDHQR2aNsPvWhpR8Sg1NAvkZtgt95LSrAbK2GSst5yc R+CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+f7PAtemGEodBFyIWJUjjhDk1POQgMBjcqlORbigBI=; b=D4rOcji88TOP8HSwjBdhsX9Z7vXJ3v3okuXNbJSjO44NV6JoER6p9tfZWeOGHjBY5Y HZyrf1KCbSLhEcWarGhNus3rcTUFg1N7cGdGVF8AgsFVkox39RP/EAjOOleJToVXHXc7 pVg83ezxt8rhTda3+2q8Cd2XNwyc5+2fcvV8ZQHecc/rKtFaYoJJeu7y88v/8wEaDT5p AN17dOmx2YTnoMgCbuNqhoK1rwLWZMeGN6l/rAi+F6uSJwo7Gq7ZPwFdbs8cgIOteVKv EnThJXflsY2bazqkHY92zxu5lsU4JFpSgIy3nv9iUlsIU8Swd3WK5SNpuRrv08J3vFQe VDBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lDJMduWzGjSw0/P7Fn+CGISTGY7f7/I01vTJIrR6oP6LvaCbz HyZ+5f8HBtnSIgi1Yw2QWdCDHW0ni1+cOCcjx00= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDPSN450XehEEuB9se5r4nY9tHdEGeDs9j44QM4gCJOqiTf8106f02d744/DvxonBXiCSNnCK1fUD/7y9pxBw= X-Received: by 2002:a92:6b0e:: with SMTP id g14mr10659777ilc.246.1616390943073; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:29:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:28:51 -0700 Message-ID: To: mykola.i.beshlei@lpnu.ua, m.seliuchenko@gmail.com, halink@ukr.net, elhadi.shakshuki@acadiau.ca, ansar.yasar@uhasselt.be, natalia.kryvinska@univie.ac.at, cerowrt-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] smart queue management conflict X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:29:03 -0000 see: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/8/2324 I do kind of wish the authors hadn't overloaded our term "smart queue management" (SQM) with their interpretation in "End-to-End QoS =E2=80=9CSma= rt Queue=E2=80=9D Management" ( https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Smart_Queue_Management/ ) It's not trademarked but, well, read the paper for some insight into lte-th= ink. --=20 "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman dave@taht.net CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729