Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-9 released

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:

>     >> while we need to drop packets from ULA src at the *WAN* edge, I am wondering

btw, there is full ipv6 NAT support in this release. Untested.


>     > That said, surviving an ipv6 renumber is a problem.  Many clients  probably
>     > don't  respect an address assignment  lifetime.
>
> I have experimental evidence that it's the opposite: clients give up their
> address and on-linkness way too easily.

I have seen that too, particularly on wireless interfaces that go to sleep.

One thing I liked that dnsmasq did that the current odhcpv6 server
does not is force a RA on a dhcpv4 request. Perhaps hostapd could do
the same
on a reassociation in some sane way.

>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html