From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68AE021F1AA for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y10so4669042wgg.25 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:18:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GNPAglD4Gqxwxis5m2bGB3nygAlfYHG5ywciPG6RGXk=; b=vGc184CbfzTl44w3+2OjRwFGnyknZmBTs0AFaWnPsAAzH9L5u3Duis4raBQ93+/ZX3 ra82ceiX5DZi2VG2r2wOUWTNRvk4920JGINhjTrbp0be1/x7vscW5G3+DkE6yqwSUgLJ jwydzGDWys6XFm+yguCcHwPZC1Jtzi49ghJBt71/JZTguMHwQ2vYQusuEQqZfxuimL8K inMw86P1b48GB3ImfV8f5DrvZwwvlfg/7K096HTggIhbfsKbAUsjloMwhVHmkEjgRfdn H1PAc3MPp0WqLMxcmo9aVI/Z07MV/qrDjINToJA1lhSJwnMgjWntIccsV23zynOtgPGB Vg8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.187.50 with SMTP id fp18mr557544wjc.89.1395069508565; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:18:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5620.1395068139@sandelman.ca> References: <5162.1395058842@sandelman.ca> <5620.1395068139@sandelman.ca> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:18:28 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Michael Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-9 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:18:30 -0000 On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Michael Richardson wrot= e: > >> while we need to drop packets from ULA src at the *WAN* edge, I am= wondering btw, there is full ipv6 NAT support in this release. Untested. > > That said, surviving an ipv6 renumber is a problem. Many clients = probably > > don't respect an address assignment lifetime. > > I have experimental evidence that it's the opposite: clients give up thei= r > address and on-linkness way too easily. I have seen that too, particularly on wireless interfaces that go to sleep. One thing I liked that dnsmasq did that the current odhcpv6 server does not is force a RA on a dhcpv4 request. Perhaps hostapd could do the same on a reassociation in some sane way. > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh netwo= rks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network archite= ct [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails= [ > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html