Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Babel-users] switching cerowrt to quagga-babeld issues

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Denis Ovsienko <infrastation@yandex.ru> wrote:
>> Does anybody know where this difference comes from?
>
> The difference comes from NetworkManager. Its efforts in reproducing high-metric RTPROT_KERNEL routes with low-metric RTPROT_STATIC ones are effectively hiding the kernel issue outside of CeroWrt runtime. Would it be better to add a watchdog shell script, which does the same, or patch the kernel?

I would *much rather* patch the kernel than have a watchdog. However I
don't quite understand
the redistribution issue vs a vs ipv6 here. If I have a "redistribute
kernel" on for ipv4, it does propagate the default route.

(I note that I dislike network manager too as it tries too hard to
work around bugs in the base OS and my own view of the world is far
more "meshy")

I'll gladly try pushing a patch up to the mainline if that's what is needed.

>
> --
>     Denis Ovsienko
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



-- 
Dave Täht
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-6 is out
with fq_codel!"