From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD56202235 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so3433858wib.10 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:18:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GarpQ8Cnps4DU5lo6bA8gswXk0adGQnTPRACW2m8Nzk=; b=GOdoMvx6/hSggG668BIyWFWrADtSFAFwfmKwk1zE3wyc3GqbvAJBCiGlJKSxMgqDA0 0eNAIcgLa6QpH9YhceA5iNsytuQLW2uo2BKjJPrA7sZ2JNuLA/CBbJbYQxCWnSiDP0Fq znS9A5EKhU9uzeipckvbEha9fXJMVDCRYFcknFN0AWRB95MtCc245kq3sALk+JxmXnnu t8tswCz77lb7IT9DmCFBmC8uYdLWHegDwWoJvyVo2OzDDlDm9q045ZJkjw5EbEv4phrC bSSh32Lx6DPStNjJSmUqh4bFJ+vUYQPhKggHRO5JulGxT7Byv9Nkh/vUtryjawpFqoq5 LkLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.198.14 with SMTP id u14mr3987948wen.12.1341321523388; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.199 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 06:18:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <751571341318910@web30g.yandex.ru> References: <2187151341044351@web9d.yandex.ru> <7isjdcpm1q.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <40851341093226@web25d.yandex.ru> <7ik3yoz7p2.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <1521341229978@web13h.yandex.ru> <206861341262491@web23d.yandex.ru> <458481341303008@web7d.yandex.ru> <751571341318910@web30g.yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:18:43 -0400 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Denis Ovsienko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: babel-users , cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Babel-users] switching cerowrt to quagga-babeld issues X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:18:45 -0000 On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Denis Ovsienko wro= te: >> Does anybody know where this difference comes from? > > The difference comes from NetworkManager. Its efforts in reproducing high= -metric RTPROT_KERNEL routes with low-metric RTPROT_STATIC ones are effecti= vely hiding the kernel issue outside of CeroWrt runtime. Would it be better= to add a watchdog shell script, which does the same, or patch the kernel? I would *much rather* patch the kernel than have a watchdog. However I don't quite understand the redistribution issue vs a vs ipv6 here. If I have a "redistribute kernel" on for ipv4, it does propagate the default route. (I note that I dislike network manager too as it tries too hard to work around bugs in the base OS and my own view of the world is far more "meshy") I'll gladly try pushing a patch up to the mainline if that's what is needed= . > > -- > Denis Ovsienko > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-6 is out with fq_codel!"