From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-x233.google.com (mail-oa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F11921F41B for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id o6so4128038oag.10 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:04:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O6rKcZEAU8dqIa0IJ9FdwW6IVEKzmTr4+wcNYIryNi0=; b=fyrtWcUgBrfT4l5KbdSKJusON6jmdhhjC/g6dH8p/rXTKsA2JLrSX7Wv8xq37a1seT mdtE5lZeBg7IyuYkc4/t9THylUjt0AU/NtP1yqrPKQMJG1GZzy1zUmipJjlZ5DBtqAaX aDOuctB+N22DItLSgMUHgAsMni765rok2US5YZkd+rvTylgjx4TRNQ8+bb/U/o4M47Pg nGAyaWB8Q0v/ZN36c1fBxwzSiv7Ww98Hu9Qvs6agMODEDl+JMmzFJ6+yD9rB9jf7H4bL NzDUmBIz0hdN79foc1u5uAQ3QIiklAH8ecZ5AnB3qfSpU5l8lu1k7aoaStFkJd4Bkjmj ICmg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.200.169 with SMTP id jt9mr10762726obc.0.1405713848779; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.93.195 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:04:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <39608.1405693428@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:04:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Valdis Kletnieks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.48-2 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:04:09 -0000 Well, in quick ipv6 testing here, a couple problems: Couldn't get a default ipv6 route via two routers to work. Definately could merely be me not having the other router setup right, didn't try hard to fix it. The ip6prefix and static ip6assign parameters in /etc/config/network appear to be mutually exclusive now. This might lead to issues where you want a static address (e.g. a 6to4 or a ula) and a dynamic one (assigned via hnetd or dhcpv6). When using the static assignment I had to force sending a default route via ra to the clients. Didn't try 6to4 or 6in4. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > Valdis: Thx for testing ipv6! > > All: > > somehow I'd managed to do a build without luci-app-bcp38. I redid the > build with it, so if you want that package, > you can do an > opkg update; opkg install luci-app-bcp38 > to get the gui for that. (and new downloads will have that package > automatically preinstalled) > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:23 AM, wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:18:31 -0700, Dave Taht said: >>> Get it at: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.4= 8-2/ >> >>> - I am focused on getting ready for ietf, and thus unable to give ipv6 >>> a shakeout without risking my vpn failing while I'm away. >> >> Basic IPv6 is still functional, ssh smtp and http are all working for me= over v6. >> So it's probably safe for you to leave for IETF. ;) > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_029= 6_indecent.article --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article