From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7F220099A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 02:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by wgbdt13 with SMTP id dt13so1153158wgb.28 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 02:33:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AbdPKuKbIq7LwM7aLDlQ2hgJsUKqFuFcNEB519pWDZc=; b=ES30sX0kRqQF7c15Hsms27vFyvJuKp8fITuXSIe7kPG5qfuVM5mi1F+UqxE699INXK wTYcs2sf/5z64GZrpcp5O2mR1v0+IrJtoucgl8EKFQ6RU+El+P2BvGiVkK7VMRVvNb4F C+Kg7uMt30/PM9QXECwcxoYZoseYcmRhx30iFH4iDFZZGakgVkPPAVHzKQfzhCeIJ9RT ADQdVqUVwcGrpvwhydjBA4bZCDVpls4JzSDr7V40A1lB//DP8L/Mr4zyWY3GGI7Ogj+c cKFRLSW/pj3iZipeJdE8wLHSUzqudjuVjxk4WUUFhzU/fP/LSdYUtKkBfXra8eHH7wWc fRFA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.90.225 with SMTP id bz1mr3133645wib.5.1330684405957; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 02:33:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.151.8 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 02:33:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 02:33:25 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Alistair Woodman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] closer ties to ltsi? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:33:29 -0000 Dear Greg: What ltsi is up to: http://ltsi.linuxfoundation.org/what-is-ltsi is orthogonal to what we are up to, in that they are trying to produce a usable, stable tree that can be used in a lot of CE devices, and we are trying to push the bleeding edge in finding, fixing, and testing things that would be good to have deployed in a lot of CE devices at least on the bufferbloat, security, and network - especially ipv6 - fronts. How to faster get stuff from "R&D" to deployment is always on my mind. I'm very happy to be successfully tracking the 3.3 process 'live' at the moment with cerowrt. I imagine the next 'stable' kernel chosen will be 3.3 or 3.4 based. How to make bloatlab #1 more effective and useful is currently on my mind, as I'm plan to rebuild it when I get back to california next week. While there's a great deal of gear under test, we could do better, and certainly having some automation and a good test suite is something I wanted to have in operation by now, and don't, as BQL + SFQRED etc really need some serious exercising. ltsi seems to have a lot of hw vendor support, we have a growing amount of ISP interest... --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://www.bufferbloat.net