[Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.17-5 PPPoE interface non-functional

[Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.17-5 PPPoE interface non-functional

[Fred Stratton]

3.10.17-3 performs well as a stable build for ADSL2plus. I tried 
3.10.17-5, and the PPPoE interface is non functional. Reverted. Will 
investigate further tomorrow pm. No obvious reason so far.

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.17-5 PPPoE interface non-functional

[Dave Taht]

3.10.17-5 has the "final" version of cisco's pie, the "final" version
of dnsmasq 2.67, and imho was finally feature complete.

regrettably it still has the sysupgrade bug and a bug was found in
dnsmasq that has not been fully addressed yet, and I haven't had the
chance to evaluate the differences between this version of pie and the
last.

It seems wise to stick with 3.10.17-3 for now unless you specifically
want to play with pie.

I will be at ietf next week fiddling with 3.10.17-3 and webrtc. Will
anyone else be in vancouver?


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
> 3.10.17-3 performs well as a stable build for ADSL2plus. I tried 3.10.17-5,
> and the PPPoE interface is non functional. Reverted. Will investigate
> further tomorrow pm. No obvious reason so far.
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.17-5 PPPoE interface non-functional

[Dave Taht]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 3.10.17-5 has the "final" version of cisco's pie, the "final" version
> of dnsmasq 2.67, and imho was finally feature complete.
>
> regrettably it still has the sysupgrade bug and a bug was found in
> dnsmasq that has not been fully addressed yet, and I haven't had the
> chance to evaluate the differences between this version of pie and the
> last.
>
> It seems wise to stick with 3.10.17-3 for now unless you specifically
> want to play with pie.

Actually, steer clear of 3.10.17-5 entirely

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/287349/

I note that I hadn't thoroughly reviewed this iteration of the code, i
was just happy to get it to compile.

> I will be at ietf next week fiddling with 3.10.17-3 and webrtc. Will
> anyone else be in vancouver?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Fred Stratton <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
>> 3.10.17-3 performs well as a stable build for ADSL2plus. I tried 3.10.17-5,
>> and the PPPoE interface is non functional. Reverted. Will investigate
>> further tomorrow pm. No obvious reason so far.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html