Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
	cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 on comcast with 18.06.1
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:44:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7Ov2h4xQHHsWzRHT-Dk_oGBzAwomWuM3sPt8Q5nO_2vA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181001162951.mt4dguv46axm5i5g@angus.ind.wpi.edu>

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:29 AM Anderson, Charles R <cra@wpi.edu> wrote:
>
> Is udp checksum offload enabled?  If so, tcpdump/wireshark won't see
> the actual checksum and assume it is bad.

I imagine it is theoretically offloaded. I DO have an 18.06.1 arm box
now up that IS
getting dhcpv6-pd from comcast....

This arm box IS getting dhcpv6-pd from comcast correctly.

root@gw1:~# cat /etc/openwrt_release
DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt'
DISTRIB_RELEASE='18.06.1'
DISTRIB_REVISION='r7258-5eb055306f'
DISTRIB_TARGET='ipq806x/generic'
DISTRIB_ARCH='arm_cortex-a15_neon-vfpv4'
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 18.06.1 r7258-5eb055306f'
DISTRIB_TAINTS=''

My mips and x86_64 boxes aren't.

Otherwise based on my 4+ year old memory of this stuff, I don't see
anything immediately wrong
with the solicit.

(I updated the bug, too)

>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:12:57AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> > hmm... bad udp checksum???
> >
> > :/tmp# 09:12:17.404257 IP6 (flowlabel 0xdfff4, hlim 1, next-header UDP
> > (17) payload length: 159) fe80::20d:b9ff:fe43:a06c.546 >
> > ff02::1:2.547: [bad udp cksum 0x58f4 -> 0xc4a1!]
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:12 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:58 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here you go! Going to go look at the firewall rules in a sec....
> > >
> > > I changed the rules to allow 547 and 546, no difference. I even
> > > flushed the ipv6tables rules entirely,
> > > and I'm running without that for a while. I can certainly imagine
> > > comcast's dhcpv6 server giving up on me....
> > >
> > > It's nice to know, btw, someone is still messing with homenet. Having
> > > zero funding for
> > > too many years burned me out on even trying. But I expected ipv6 to
> > > keep working without
> > > any more help from me! :(
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:45 AM Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sigh. Once upon a time I used to test this stuff on comcast. So I
> > > > > > finally got around to deploying
> > > > > > a new 18.06 gateway and ipv6 is busted with comcast.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please email me output from "tcpdump -n -vvv -i <wan> port 546 or
> > > > > port 547 or icmp6" as your WAN is trying to get DHCPv6-PD ? Or if you dump
> > > > > that to a pcap and email it to me (or make it available somewhere for me
> > > > > to download).
> > > > >
> > > > > I have 18.06.1 working with homenet on WRT1200AC,dual uplinks (two
> > > > > different vlans on WAN), getting dual stack from both ISPs, /56 from both,
> > > > > and both are announced out on LAN. I even configured bidirectional SQM
> > > > > with CAKE on each uplink (250/50 and 250/100 respectively) and it seems to
> > > > > do the right thing.



-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-01 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-01 15:30 Dave Taht
2018-10-01 15:45 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2018-10-01 15:58   ` Dave Taht
2018-10-01 16:12     ` Dave Taht
2018-10-01 16:12       ` Dave Taht
2018-10-01 16:29         ` Anderson, Charles R
2018-10-01 16:44           ` Dave Taht [this message]
2018-10-01 17:13         ` Michael Richardson
2018-10-01 17:22           ` Dave Taht
2018-10-01 19:07       ` Mikael Abrahamsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw7Ov2h4xQHHsWzRHT-Dk_oGBzAwomWuM3sPt8Q5nO_2vA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cra@wpi.edu \
    --cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox