From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:34:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7PSiYT0JGFSDrHZG61VYEo_ZtXVvk-0zJSv+CLMRFLZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAMzHDaU8jfgsCEb0r4kms8Y0C4+dNxG4fx+AkQiEdazGdAw0w@mail.gmail.com>
If it did download + ping or upload + ping or download/upload + ping I
would be happy.
If it ran for long enough by default to detect speedboost AND show the
result I'd be happier.
That said, it's not worse than speedtest.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and
> well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I
> found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able to
> determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows you
> to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for
> over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have
> used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net
> and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that instead
> of speedtest.net and thoughts?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-23 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-23 15:52 Ernesto Elias
2014-03-23 16:34 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-03-23 16:39 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-24 16:33 Lucas Wan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw7PSiYT0JGFSDrHZG61VYEo_ZtXVvk-0zJSv+CLMRFLZQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ernestogelias@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox