From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE7321F20A for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so1770015wib.4 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:34:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g6TUCTmTTiCcOHlAt9hFZPNuwmNMwWqMSwqW5c4S+7k=; b=KdEqLSNFApocE6Q5XTE0mMVJvyG6e96hk4Z3+lNu8C6bnKoTNQvtwIjmba5c28e9I2 ENIbDRAcs2qxQCMfWrehK4ShYtO0dw7eF4CgTPvhGJWyKJEHSWBZ0s7ajfK9DLxgkAwY 3WXp/iCh8HpOb94SFI1BQRas/cx9gGEUWp39E0JGvgSAjpq+yM3WHL3dF8PUO8Eqns7G jbnTXb8TFQloTQW0gE4Mllx67vRKBZVLo7CrhiDhiCH4q6/IZaXWnZMv0M6xubC19CXL STLt26npzjwxC/Egw8S5UKAvB7MhdiGQgD2rgmEFW82y/HTuH9XdZCOhDe3I2FrHxtnK U0IA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.97.37 with SMTP id dx5mr9534950wib.53.1395592476746; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:34:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:34:36 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Ernesto Elias Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:34:40 -0000 If it did download + ping or upload + ping or download/upload + ping I would be happy. If it ran for long enough by default to detect speedboost AND show the result I'd be happier. That said, it's not worse than speedtest. On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Ernesto Elias wr= ote: > Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and > well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I > found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able= to > determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows yo= u > to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for > over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have > used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.n= et > and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that instea= d > of speedtest.net and thoughts? > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html