From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EF821F1E0 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id bs8so2541839wib.12 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:15:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qdlr98tc0NwN2OFhNBideNfVEviZfLoaayQPAB7kpj4=; b=rrtMlVQIzCb7tAdnDY3FVz3kUor0SlCCIdScXlONvELQ0NqtbXIvQKNbEeK7XaP+Rp 9b8ynwn426RezcmJgsGo6oTueQElwrWnXEUeU/j7T8vtzUglUTj0M1lGRW64boeQNE1R 2lObwGbJ1jMkW+bLLXJkmjdLZAYbHMR38hC9mA+XJZ5IZp6renrVbF2tIvxprapy+W+m Y4DLsARLj9IfeGT27ZiLcY6LNRLaDXjfQ5XsfRvGam3HpyMRqXQ5g4wOb3MzFc0YhgrI 9TV5XfN8PX51Ywfr3AEzuppwvM1YajL8cs+H9nd8EM1VUGp0IvbbpeN8eCg2tXhHqJp8 EwDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.144 with SMTP id bw16mr16344509wjb.1.1393211714612; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:15:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:15:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140223170738.GA24483@lists.bufferbloat.net> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:15:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Vincent Frentzel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] IPV6 success on 3.10.28-14 with 6to4 tunnel and 6relayd X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:15:17 -0000 until very recently I was using the dnsmasq version of the RA stuff, (basically uncommenting everything in /etc/dnsmasq.conf ) I was under the impression that what I'd had switched to worked, but didn't try this scenario. (it seems to work on the default gw box, but not interna= lly) I tend to pretty much run babel everywhere, too, which doesn't help... Anyway, on the interior gateway I have going... I statically assign something available from my /60 to the se00 interface, and I no longer get a message from that interface saying this: Mon Feb 24 03:07:03 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1318]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on gw00 thus we don't announce a default route! Mon Feb 24 03:07:03 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1318]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on sw00 thus we don't announce a default route! Mon Feb 24 03:07:03 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1318]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on gw10 thus we don't announce a default route! Mon Feb 24 03:07:03 2014 daemon.warn odhcpd[1318]: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on sw10 thus we don't announce a default route! (so I assume it's trying to announce a default route to the se00 interface, or at least thinks it is) I am seeing the /60 inserted into the local default table as well as a generic route inserted by ras... default from :: via fe80::8e:f2ff:fefa:a153 dev ge00 proto static metric = 1024 default from 2601:9:6680:530::/60 via fe80::8e:f2ff:fefa:a153 dev ge00 proto babel metric 1024 so I: killall -1 odhcpd # this forces a RA But in doing that, I am not seeing a default route announced via RA via radvdump. Sigh. prefix 2601:X:Y:535::/64 { AdvValidLifetime 7200; AdvPreferredLifetime 1800; AdvOnLink on; AdvAutonomous on; AdvRouterAddr off; }; # End of prefix definition RDNSS 2601:X:Y:535::1 { AdvRDNSSLifetime 1800; }; # End of RDNSS definition DNSSL desk.armory.com { AdvDNSSLLifetime 1200; }; # End of DNSSL definition /etc/config/dhcp has this in it, which sort of matches your 6relayd config config dhcp 'se00' option interface 'se00' option start '2' option limit '26' list dhcp_option '42,0.0.0.0' list dhcp_option '44,0.0.0.0' list dhcp_option '45,0.0.0.0' list dhcp_option '46,8' option leasetime '24h' option domain 'desk.armory.com' option ra 'server' option dhcpv6 'server' On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Vincent Frentzel wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > After struggling a while with odhcpd and route propagation I wanted to >> > report that I got ipv6 working with the following config for 6relayd. >> >> I am under the impression that 6relayd is now obsolete and that these >> are controlled in the /etc/config/dhcp file. > > > That is correct. However, when using odhcpd I could nt get IPV6 routing o= ver > different segments (ie pings from SW10 to SE00 gave network unreachable). > In the end 6relayd worked althoug Im not sure why. > > Im curious to see if anyone has encountered the same issue. > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Dave Taht > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:15:13AM +0100, Vincent Frentzel wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > After struggling a while with odhcpd and route propagation I wanted to >> > report that I got ipv6 working with the following config for 6relayd. >> >> I am under the impression that 6relayd is now obsolete and that these >> are controlled in the /etc/config/dhcp file. >> >> > >> > config server se00 >> > list network se00 >> > option rd server >> > option dhcpv6 server >> > option management_level 1 >> > >> > config server sw00 >> > list network sw00 >> > option rd server >> > option dhcpv6 server >> > option management_level 1 >> > >> > config server sw10 >> > list network sw10 >> > option rd server >> > option dhcpv6 server >> > option management_level 1 >> > >> > >> > Hope this can be of use to someone or contribute to the next release := ) >> > >> > >> > BR, >> > >> > Vincent >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html