From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3039121F1EF for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u56so4893076wes.3 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:27:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HMjX+XyZ2sA/3Si5p2Sm0oHFeoWUalTuFc7wnRqqt8s=; b=lMAyKDFXoDz2waPBHt/+EuiDQgO0qWlGx8TnPiFl3JZWBjDOyKAcT3j8xINV09JGiN bYzjpqCR2twsb+hprjrCZMZ5nFlRIh3tgvI23yEOd0750sUhNpmWqYoHxjvR4rA9FqST x7QfXBAEHGgaa+Chv/NmKIeY027y5FRUwcp/BWAUnhFCUACdg9JaLae6hTOOdWmFhBfM 1uKWmPCQlb+OPxbeGY62dfO9y/TPihFXixRzJN85dFhXegkPSAopsCiJIg2bEhY//+OP uVz5YL7h/b7np/TpB8245J7oENF2RZHaH8y/iB79MaHkXUOqXA4THzdiyUdg5Hhrb2oO Qr/A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.144 with SMTP id bw16mr19219297wjb.1.1393255641977; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:27:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:27:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <631f38e0-0042-4f4d-a8df-4975dc497ab7@email.android.com> References: <20140223170738.GA24483@lists.bufferbloat.net> <631f38e0-0042-4f4d-a8df-4975dc497ab7@email.android.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:27:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Steven Barth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Vincent Frentzel , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] IPV6 success on 3.10.28-14 with 6to4 tunnel and 6relayd X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:27:24 -0000 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Steven Barth wrote: > Normally it should work as soon as the 2 conditions: router has any defau= lt > route and interface has a public prefix are satisfied. Can't see anything > obviously wrong here. Hmm will have a look later again. Data point from last night: I get correct RAs (with a default route) on the sw00 interface. Not on the se00 interface. There is no difference in configuration between the two interfaces, so perhaps there's an off-by-one or similar in odhcp still. --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html