From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-x22a.google.com (mail-ia0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 960D821F1AA for ; Sun, 5 May 2013 05:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k20so2566529iak.29 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q1f/pZtwQIVDT8spuYNNUbQdD1voky0RAj5LPWCE3Cg=; b=y4yi+icNZoa50qWr5rgapRGLQPwbOFUwfEOO9YgNcFLsFnxfhSGzelObGuKGQgBi19 aJAniUy2Mo2K9VNy1tqQ13S248xM7eyyZ28VNkaHnnQb1RhqVhS0rbqPhNYlIryAGdDh 4q08NceMhQx6AV+fjCmQw6pPoIUb3EU8tjb/GcvWJOKMT+QcARMxeLoCqX168md+g8Wr UGH4Shu4rzCcWzBUljGYoUb9aVkqDbBcv5JDFpR0Hg+DCTBjIBYCvNqN2+8WNvGm5ywK O8WpiQ7uIr3VHOWV05tnDkuwC0nnBJp0nMP971TGVZJFwJ516bVBmuLEVPFAUPNPPE4t sdZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.236.100 with SMTP id ut4mr1397411igc.86.1367755340628; Sun, 05 May 2013 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.7.51 with HTTP; Sun, 5 May 2013 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51794652.4030906@gmail.com> References: <5177DDA8.8010801@gmail.com> <51794652.4030906@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 05:02:20 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Robert Bradley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] atomic route updates? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:02:21 -0000 On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Robert Bradley wrote: > On 24/04/13 16:46, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> There is a possibly related bug being discussed on the babel-users list >> with an >> easy fix. >> >> Not sure what kernel versions it happens on. >> > > I was seeing that bug on the quantal 3.5 kernel as well. So far, testing > with the raring 3.8 kernel seems to fix both the unreachable route bug an= d > the random /128 route bugs. My patched babeld also appears to work no wo= rse > than the distro-provided 1.3.1 build. That said, with both versions I se= e > that babeld switches to wireless routes and stays there if eth0 is > disconnected and later restored. Still stuck on this? I'm planning a new build this week with your atomic route stuff in it. babel 1.3.6 and 1.40 have been released. > > It may be time for me to try running the babeld HEAD code without the > patches and compare the behaviour of that to the patched version next... > > > -- > Robert Bradley > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html