From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35CD921F415; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigz129 with SMTP id z129so21568851oig.1; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:36:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1rjl2y2lVQXOQVI5tPIGGe8rrwxGVenzYpyI0UT3mDk=; b=t1pdC0+CKiAuC55x1Tei8lhCewdrvLxp2jTjkrd7aGVczWgSudwHzl+Vn7AWVncsQ1 x//ZtUTfFgTMBdGEfWuhkM5r0UAWVh0RTobuFAIUabETW1bsuESAiNW1EcbQpwsjiOkn g3Suh8Z2KpTLnX55OvWhUSVlwePuzBtSg/qDh4YFz3Wj5CJMDELFUgMyVEk1fESLX+bv iUj8gpzpWnOP/Q+/qOdJGg5SesRsk/fhH6Aw8wnta39HU3NMrj1SSJ1+lWFtf2FlxXiP NFu1EyO9OhwMlvYPOF7vWMepbqcHLXBQKlr89vyS10OHbUk9H6+gkZXsx8EkoArOgknX lThg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.158.73 with SMTP id ws9mr14792162oeb.24.1427427370965; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:36:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130F86596@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:36:10 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bloat , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6b7fe63a26e05123cd595 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:36:40 -0000 --047d7bd6b7fe63a26e05123cd595 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:35 PM Subject: Re: [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a To: Hans Liu Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" , HOMENET Working Group < homenet@ietf.org>, Claire Cheng , "aqm@ietf.org= " up until this moment I had never heard of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1905 this spec, and it does sound useful. +10 on more open access to it. +100 on anyone working on open source code for it. I would certainly like closer relationships between the IEEE and IETF one day, perhaps even a truly joint (as opposed to back to back) conference. For far too long members of these two orgs have been going to different parties, and many, many cross layer issues have arisen due to this. In my own case I had hoped (in dropping ietf) to be able to attend more IEEE 802.11 wg meetings - but I would really prefer to stay home and code for a while. I would be very supportive of someone(s) taking on the tasks of better grokking wifi and other non-ethernet media across both orgs both in the context of homenet and in aqm. PS While I have a good grip on cable media layers, I am lacking such on gpon... --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb --047d7bd6b7fe63a26e05123cd595 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

---------- Forwarded messag= e ----------
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com= >
Date: Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [homenet]= IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a
To: Hans Liu <hansliu@gmail.com>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, HOMENET Working Gro= up <homenet@ietf.org>, Claire= Cheng <claire.cheng@dlink= corp.com>, "aqm@ietf.org&qu= ot; <aqm@ietf.org>


up until this moment I had never heard of=

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1905

this spec, and it does= sound useful.

+10 on more open access to it. +100 on anyone w= orking on open source code for it.

I would certainly like clos= er relationships between the IEEE and IETF one day, perhaps even a truly jo= int (as opposed to back to back) conference. For far too long members of th= ese two orgs have been going to different parties, and many, many cross lay= er issues have arisen due to this.

In my own case I had hoped = (in dropping ietf) to be able to attend more IEEE 802.11 wg meetings - but = I would really prefer to stay home and code for a while.

I would be = very supportive of someone(s) taking on the tasks of better grokking wifi a= nd other non-ethernet media across both orgs both in the context of homenet= and in aqm.

PS While I have a good grip on cable media layers= , I am lacking such on gpon...



--
Dave = T=C3=A4ht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
=
https://plus.google.com/u/0/10794217561599370655= 8/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
--047d7bd6b7fe63a26e05123cd595--