Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I've always liked the idea of doing up building-wide networks

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

I've been looking for a copy of this paper for a long time, and
finally found it.

http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~sylvia/cs268-2014/papers//FQ1989.pdf

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all
>> the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs
>> with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment
>> building than everybody installing one willy-nilly.
>
>
> the key is the co-ordinated channel allocation, beyond that it can be better
> to have more, "worse" wifi APs than fewer "better" ones to reduce
> interference.
>
>> http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=20140717-0146
>
>
> looks interesting
>
>
>> BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put
>> it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting
>> other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes
>> a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this
>> (and the mit paper) to the list?
>
>
> to the list, even if it's a link I don't care about, it's easier to delete
> it along with other e-mail than to go to G+ and look at it.
>
> Also, remember that people's G+ feeds show a sampling of what other people
> post, so some people will miss it if you only post it to G+
>
> David Lang



-- 
Dave Täht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article