From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE75D21F336 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e131so2208455oig.32 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F7Uul/qHAAvu2FaAL46goSUIolumZHh2J6CyKe6a+oE=; b=tNXTb867l0qms6/1ZW5sPiyCxOk6A+uS1NLIzPUhaHe982OhmVD6ij+WEqcCgkBMsb Qx5fL9PxCjOmbwBwehNVtoyWHLHofByYxjCPvKm/ycnmX1WW7VAHBDZQsMzLNHb63uEv R+ES7HZnPnXHX9H/huTQheTMsCkMnXpJSE/H8jMSi14JFSEt/YgypPQzXJTFytUHmKWt JTvDkHZjDS0ehDxSPpahbKYPq2hXl8XjupWbbWPoLRw3i5dJ9XW3z/HdxpN/26ePmMVq a4flrE0EKlBz/uQ+FS02e5edufSuwhqeT1JTvub3Sy/DDmjS3M8AOs77TijxNoDIzN3Y SO2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.176.10 with SMTP id ce10mr12178740oec.8.1405729912391; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.93.195 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:31:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:31:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: David Lang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I've always liked the idea of doing up building-wide networks X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:31:55 -0000 I've been looking for a copy of this paper for a long time, and finally found it. http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~sylvia/cs268-2014/papers//FQ1989.pdf On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, David Lang wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Dave Taht wrote: > >> ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all >> the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs >> with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment >> building than everybody installing one willy-nilly. > > > the key is the co-ordinated channel allocation, beyond that it can be bet= ter > to have more, "worse" wifi APs than fewer "better" ones to reduce > interference. > >> http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=3D20140717-0146 > > > looks interesting > > >> BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put >> it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting >> other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes >> a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this >> (and the mit paper) to the list? > > > to the list, even if it's a link I don't care about, it's easier to delet= e > it along with other e-mail than to go to G+ and look at it. > > Also, remember that people's G+ feeds show a sampling of what other peopl= e > post, so some people will miss it if you only post it to G+ > > David Lang --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article