From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D209B21F1BB for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:54:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k14so6453666iea.10 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:54:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Zzrs9+PGk88ZLKKc80e/ysnL84NxWfaCtI98v9Z5MA4=; b=o98Dg0yuc/edSQjgVTfxRxOX7F98pPsInguYkZ6LWrUhylhoii5NpvaYXfy96M3VIz BFwwZQXdaSOOWfxyF3kW3wtV+fZZMa0Pyv5hLzd+lIPldh+NFuUURg0DfSjkUPUjDjCg JDsfNO67xlHcadiC7V6pohjWyiRkXOcUGC7BD0t+8qck+6oYuf9sP+IAqSoFe9uxyR0e N1KS7pgOJwNH6n5EGCGkMLKA8gPGRIQgUwtapNLhxliJVLk6w0XKg4pY+DDglRkWBhhg XCpBosnutNmjVdzB1Tbw0sfEHwvqJOT7I7leSaGaA5NlLNbNj8W03Es7ByJNVbCjBlR8 pROw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.88.136 with SMTP id bg8mr2413877igb.96.1358524461810; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:54:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:54:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADA4D5@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:54:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Richard Brown Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f235a17f7030904d3921ff1 Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.7.2-3 released, still in a battle with ipv6 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:54:23 -0000 --e89a8f235a17f7030904d3921ff1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable all: Could you post the generated dnsmasq.conf file and your network file and cc steven barth? On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > There are multiple threads on the stateless dhcp and dhcp implementation > going on here: > > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q1/thread.ht= ml > > among other things, "enable-ra" should be getting set in the generated > dnsmasq conf file and probably isn't right now. Perhaps it can be manuall= y > set? > > I'm hoping ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really wasn'= t > planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO care about > exercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are still a > few new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 419) > > (dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assign the delegated prefix= ) > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Richard Brown > wrote: > >> Dave, Maciej, >> >> On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:47 PM, < >> cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Maciej Soltysiak >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, I configured he.net tunnel according to >>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 and works with latest 3.7.2-4. >>> >>> However I don't understand how my client is supposed get an ip6 address= . >>> radvd is gone and I don't see anything handing out me an ip6 addr. Who'= s >>> job is it now then? >>> >> >> dnsmasq is supposed to do the job now, but the configuration via openwrt= 's >> config is in flux. There is documentation floating about on >> dnsmasq-discuss as well as inside the the dnsmasq-2.66test10 tarball on = how >> to do it at the command line.... >> >> >> I have the same problem with 3.7.2-4: my HE.net connection works fine, >> CeroWrt gets the expected global IPv6 addresses, and each of the five >> interfaces (not but not the babel ones) get nice routed global addresses >> allocated from my /48. >> >> But my Mac (using either wired or wireless) doesn't get a v6 address. >> Do you have any links to the dnsmasq documentation (a quick google didn'= t >> turn up anything.) Thanks. >> >> Rich >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> > > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --e89a8f235a17f7030904d3921ff1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
all:

Could you post the generated dnsmasq.conf fil= e and your network file and cc steven barth?

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com= > wrote:
There are multiple threads on the stateless = dhcp and dhcp implementation going on here:


among other things, "enable-ra" should be get= ting set in the generated dnsmasq conf file and probably isn't right no= w. Perhaps it can be manually set?=A0

I'm hopi= ng ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really wasn't = planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO care about ex= ercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are still a few = new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 419)

(dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assig= n the delegated prefix)

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Richard Brown &l= t;Rich.Brow= n@intermapper.com> wrote:
Dave, Maciej,

On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:47 PM, <cerowrt-devel-request@lists.buf= ferbloat.net>=A0=A0wrote:

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Maciej Soltysiak=A0<maciej@soltysiak.com>=A0wrote:
Hi, I configured=A0he.net=A0tunnel according to=A0http://wiki= .openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6=A0and works with latest 3.7.2-4.
=A0
However I don't understand how my client is supposed get an ip6 ad= dress. radvd is gone and I don't see anything handing out me an ip6 add= r. Who's job is it now then?

dnsmasq is supposed to do the job now, but the configuration via openwrt= 9;s
config is in flux. There is documentation floating about on dnsmasq-discuss= as well as inside the the dnsmasq-2.66test10 tarball on how to do it at th= e command line....

I have the same problem with 3.7.2-4: my HE.net connection works fine, CeroWrt gets the expected = global IPv6 addresses, and each of the five interfaces (not but not the bab= el ones) get nice routed global addresses allocated from my /48.

But my Mac (using either wired or wireless) doesn't get a v6 addre= ss. Do you have any links to the dnsmasq documentation (a quick google didn= 't turn up anything.) Thanks.

Rich

_________________________________________= ______
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Ce= rowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



<= br>
--
Dave T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http:= //www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=20



--
Dave T=E4ht<= br>
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/s= ubscribe.html=20 --e89a8f235a17f7030904d3921ff1--