From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F16521F2B6 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1261150wib.6 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uJ/Wjf4UR8EcGZ6aoFv/3PnxklI74sBOGMW1xcTXuVU=; b=NcBQeDDAXxem0XB1I1RRbIvaCjquW1DI6nVBPZa35/sGdtO75xU0NgotJLywE0SaYP KY2kDi2epP19SOZbdwaF0+4TPNy1ptcHPYdjGZtpA8I5bS5uFBMudN6OWOuBxtf3mxBD SsK7E8qdv37gIlrszA9K1+OOJZpwk7xtohacL6d84U2LcoRrpixdq0n6ewSsbhMaIp4j aVXu6/fXO9fop8zU7ZofkAlHDiaoMeIJlWIkxKzz9Py37c2C9GbmyEoTPGIjG9J/TyEl xwIVhJEbl5FwLZ+zoG+dxkAh+N/pV73RGRGSl6OWochmxlJJUpXXa49zWH3fxsh0Ga/c uBEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.87.170 with SMTP id az10mr8068287wjb.1.1402069992503; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.207.82 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:53:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Dane Medic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Secure ad-hoc interface X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:53:14 -0000 On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Dane Medic wrote: > Hi, > > are there any plans to add WPA encryption on ibss interface in cerowrt? Not clear what you mean. adhoc doesn't work with wpa, so far as I know. I HAVE long thought that shipping with wpa enabled on the main interfaces was probably a good idea, but what I'd like in that case is to mandate that the wpa keys, ssid, and root password be changed on first install, actually= . > > > Cheers > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article