From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4703B25E for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:08:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id k142so64619047oib.1 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:08:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mC4m9RBHounvkChRVLvzHuhmdXpeekmbG2zeEiV/VKk=; b=V45iZP06j2WFb98Xn+L1qdxrHZQ2b7Y821Jrp+C8frqzF3LCgXhHoV8x7Hf5349dkD ZKMwy6d7UIrlJ0RO4x6U2RS/ahJiCjofI3U/wyBV2DqZGvD/PR/kuVTpIWJJBWS8BmJB GiOBO2YPaN1Zt3wDeIV8AxpIMuP8cRgthvyVZ5t9sCUTB2XOiXtCZ4fFjDw1GooxU0hZ cSIfN3v1ZFICsUjDuUz1trV9xMjwZCDyk/k3233Zdzq6na/TfVIMEPRwhAgf5BKwKXLm nXVJCHn4pnA+XJHmM+XOMfOpvJU8aK0nE6LJvsV5EmNtW5YWoGiFlDamp8u2h76/NzWj RkQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mC4m9RBHounvkChRVLvzHuhmdXpeekmbG2zeEiV/VKk=; b=DK7HMv/6whHo2XUmdNjGr7Vrb4J+MQ1yDXHGw5cDDXM7qMtAMyAJ1ePtaPk4Yv3YtH 2YgJYW3b3zhzjZ6/dQu3ncizaIzvfUkEycJKEJ0HyM2T2nPoWQNokRN0UI0dz7XC/wCs zEGaeKIwFsG61h4USX6OvUvEphpiK77tH0I/kOt0JZb84o7GIdOA3taxGNstLvllZkNP Zuk8tB4XyxFKd+ebNQEK3oyfLlKaXOdpZsVhhbwaMQE76zx/35pciGRxcQUlJUyRScrl 03l7/+epbdjCsXZdKdoOdh6kq9g7pjfLC9FISF9P0L0tsdYCC+hjqAIKWM9Q8xezeK1H UlaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWv/W9SvAVBxDN0a5nGpZYKT0B6WaROrG6WDQz2dQ3ze7r+ll2AIDXNn79lu1CTmQRmyGPRj4SB79nLsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.57.132 with SMTP id y4mr4370260otb.169.1461794886475; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.78.23 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:08:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57213763.7030602@gmail.com> References: <57213763.7030602@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:08:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Richard Smith Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] bugs using the 1200ac as a target X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:08:07 -0000 run netserver on the router. It doesn't seem to matter what qdisc is on the router. hit it with the flent rrul_be or rrul tests. (or just multiple netperfs) You'll see one flow completely take over the router in this case and the others starve. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> it has something deeply wrong in it at a gbit. In this test I'd failed >> over to a faster link at a gigE to show WTF it does - one flow totally >> wipes out the others. >> >> >> http://blog.cerowrt.org/flent/failing_over_faster/linksys_1200_majorly_h= eadblocking.svg > > > What's your test conditions? I'll duplicate the test on my 1900acs and s= ee > if it's there as well. > > > -- > Richard A. Smith > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org