From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBD1921F237; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a141so1280667oig.9 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:32:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V0uctVu4BVRq+4WEc3BuUTrSx0kgIKmXvnTyw9BxkFo=; b=Qpr+VjjzY+kbqDSAA9mSH6vi5ZDlmVua5AiUbzOjBKyv4uU6JENnnE8P1P1cZsIqs2 RSuPM2D/mFMuJwuohlhaomR5wa+lsqVhTxJK80DAXOACqJGNH0XDrm6KJqmap6EpuYtv feGUzQdXDmtzegsSxsJrIa/r5gFn8pgnDoCUGAsH4GD6ptNr7uFBr/49u3ValBvrY3R6 D1hfiyQSM9TsuJrUx4HB5zniSS1V7DYmKG1sGSUWpDgFA4dsFaQzFEZMzUsUNR+JwHnj N27uIbnMnBRGUEo1+9e4EiKKjAcdfhIo7Xh7zDtAs4GFcjz4RAXrpawY6Z5A5MMJYMZ4 2GJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.138.103 with SMTP id qp7mr47448205obb.56.1405618328609; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.93.195 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:32:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bloat , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] edgerouter fq_codel notes X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:32:11 -0000 A few months back I took a timeout (pair of weekends!) to get fq_codel up and running on the edgerouter series of products from ubiquiti. It was nice to have a chance to deal with questions from a new audience, see what went wrong at higher rates, reframe my arguments, explain stuff in general, and deal with a whole new set of bugs.... registration and joining the developer program is required to see the enormous (230+ messages!) thread generated, which grew increasingly philosophical towards the end... http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Beta/Testing-fq-codel-in-v1-5-0beta1/t= d-p/828626 In the long run I hope to use this enormous volume of text and links in some new writing(s), particularly on BQL, but if you are bored of the slow traffic here, have fun over there. There were also about 10 subthreads generated throughout the site, if you search for fq_codel. Although I like the edgerouter series a lot (the pro has been really helpful in my lab), it does seem like a significant amount of work is needed to make it do what I wanted (good >200mbit inbound qos), well, and while that work continues (there is much buried potential in the hardware!), I keep looking for easier wins. Certainly even the edgerouter lite outperforms cerowrt across the board. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article