From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B213D21F1EC for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id fp1so9753512pdb.28 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R6NW33vk9C5uLzMjXIun46ujIAUkzYmNMVLdOsm0afw=; b=UX4eC1ZWqXrBZ2iuGvwfcJVR21YFExXmjxrBX//SJDueuPVLlLz3cWIDYnYWU3Pyc3 M6hhTCHHcu9/H9LmY0GMLz37rbEeRJS02FmVEp79DDQOcYvwgmD77O7pDBKdVVqhUVRr p5ezZHz+e2fQzMuQxRH1+uy2uECn0tD4FrjZ1O6EJ7p6nhmrOhiSWPtzArS19wnng1Vo tLl7NE0qFiK1zQPODH8ahjSspt0iCZP9IOol4u6WGpDc4o9u26B3k/93gb6Sw+dbwJ9w tcK0IoZz1QDAToPo2exq3mvFlc6jVkGCIo6EaLq/Ii4kLTQsqZOnm+8ukkmHAHMQE5OZ MoSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.237.133 with SMTP id vc5mr31801488pbc.92.1396365133116; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.10.197 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <533A7529.5020001@etorok.net> References: <533A7529.5020001@etorok.net> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:12:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] byte queue limits? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:12:13 -0000 It is not needed for sqm-scripts as BQL is not generally hit except at large quantums for htb. BQL is mostly only needed for ethernet devices that run at line rate. No equivalent of BQL exists for wifi devices, sadly. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:13 AM, T=F6r=F6k Edwin wrote: > Hi, > > Is setting byte_queue_limits not needed anymore? The sqm-scripts don't se= em to set it. > > Best regards, > --Edwin > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html