From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F65E21F35E for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:02:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id uz6so12329556obc.2 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:02:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dRISMfv+egod+6giMnEpTQHEJMxSd+j4iyS8SHo0nAs=; b=BWu0FuNPV7SZ2Th8gm2WM/Gdk8yi/mYrb+MrzU6k64ebdXD61/Z+precZMkiiWPSNE b/7GhScnNfYFP5WNd4Olo9tHlya79MMOp3NdprZZXNJg+bw17RkMY1iAeoIAdmSQLtqu 1cvJoz0q7RWtMCLyJsWLRsZGU1FWI1HMtMlJKHIcyjNnur+grLaU5e3TCltEzBmNwsf8 zw/croMBospWqeyI+J0KxMOE8etT0Cf5n+1pXOZJyHE6C56VNhuAh9ugt7pTXhrLx9h4 rtGVatnzekOLGHggX5n0D70GwKxWXy81dTdQLW+tufkef0yufruiSxzLX+/glGyTxOs8 pslg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.52.72 with SMTP id r8mr4680597oeo.75.1418994123933; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:02:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.169.209 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:02:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5493E0FF.1020809@iki.fi> References: <15610.1418851812@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <5493E0FF.1020809@iki.fi> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:02:03 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Erkki Lintunen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Announcing New airFiber24HD X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:02:33 -0000 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Erkki Lintunen wrote: > > FWIW... > > On 12/17/2014 11:40 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> well... I loved that they aimed for low latency in their design. > > Other big players seem to aim for low latancy as well, although in > different wireless network technology and in reality yet far away from > readily available products compared to the airFiber. Well, if they published their actual queuing delays, it would generally be a different picture. > > Just yesterday a finnish magazine Elektroniikka Lehti published an > article (in finnish), where Research Director of Nokia Networks is cited > to say: > > "Nokia's vision 5G network means a system that brings users the best > 10-gigabit data rates of one millisecond delay, but on the one hand, for > example, should IoT machine to run on battery power for 10 years. These > requirements for the data rate is the easiest to achieve, after all, > Nokia [has] already [demoed] LTE-Advanced technology 4.1 gigabit link. > > One millisecond of latency is a very tough technical challenge." > > Translation by Google, mods marked [] by me, link to the original article > > > > Google Traslator does pretty good translation except on a sentence in > the beginning: > > "ZTE, the test was examined in particular the so-called. Massive MIMO > Solutions, where the base station antenna 128 is used for the head." > > should be > > "In the test ZTE examined in particular the so-called Massive MIMO > Solutions, where the base station has 128 antenna heads." > > Best, > Erkki > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks