From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966D221F22F for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:34:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t61so2154272wes.31 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JuLFQo73vKKRBJ8gyCp8/YWomiIFj6/l4ybO7f+aEPE=; b=c4XhoNFudoyPtX5XA4Swh8KVSkprUvLDJ9BMG6oN2V4XfdLPb67IglhUJ2p8hn17TT Mqwp6IXqeGVfLVwwJPuKNsC2uAs2XPRVkWSXf8fhV+FE/quQVG8cJMRlPuamekm6IaDC RPHfYEsR7q2lg3DDhZ9yUVNOQJDh9/PoYaW187K90MliliVqQtQmeb5BVXVFvCQKx7Wu IC4CYT8Tau4Kc30aub0jmHGqkGbno67uXdEIxjoToO8gZfpvjlsYqbn945i8W1b8kqn8 HiDXSYxRHyty7VPxe0Bys06SfSegmoa6kOYF8F0o7Jq8Up7tjMwtuU5cwdezCd262aVz ++Pw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.87.163 with SMTP id az3mr4969145wjb.63.1394062455698; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 23:34:15 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.32-4 issues X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:34:49 -0000 those zones appear empty in the gui because we use the + syntax to join the= m, which the gui cannot interperet. there are a multitude of issues with 3.10.32-X at the moment. I am at a conference. Felix is on vacation. Don't try it. I keep hoping to spend an hour with the openwrt devs here to see everything that is going wrong now that hncp was nearly unanimously approved by the homenet working group as the way forward (yea!) The last patches for dnsmasq landed last week and simon tells me he plans a stable release soon. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi All, > > I just upgraded to 3.10.32-4 and locally all looks quite well. Both my ma= cbook and my nexus 4 get stable connections to cerowrt over the 5GHz radio = (HT40+ channel 44 country code: DE), also the machine on se00 gets a decent= address. That is all machines get decent IP4 addresses, only cerowrt gets = a working ipv6 address. > Unfortunatelly the only machine that can reach the internet is th= e cerowrt itself, none of the connected machines can reach the internet (th= ey can reach each other just fine) > Here is a bit information from the linux host on se00: > > moeller@happy-horse:~> sudo /sbin/ip -4 r l > default via 172.30.42.1 dev eth0 > 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link > 172.30.42.0/27 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.30.42.22 > moeller@happy-horse:~> ifconfig > Absolute path to 'ifconfig' is '/sbin/ifconfig', so running it may requir= e superuser privileges (eg. root). > moeller@happy-horse:~> sudo /sbin/ifconfig > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 28:92:4A:30:5D:BE > inet addr:172.30.42.22 Bcast:172.30.42.31 Mask:255.255.255.22= 4 > inet6 addr: fe80::2a92:4aff:fe30:5dbe/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:478 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:549 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:50463 (49.2 Kb) TX bytes:163720 (159.8 Kb) > Interrupt:18 > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1 > RX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:1312 (1.2 Kb) TX bytes:1312 (1.2 Kb) > > moeller@happy-horse:~> ping -c 10 www.google.com > PING www.google.com (173.194.69.104) 56(84) bytes of data. > > --- www.google.com ping statistics --- > 10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 8999ms > > moeller@happy-horse:~> sudo /sbin/ip -4 a l > 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qle= n 1000 > inet 172.30.42.22/27 brd 172.30.42.31 scope global eth0 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > moeller@happy-horse:~> sudo /sbin/ip -4 route > moeller@happy-horse:~> > > > To me this looks reasonable and I am unsure why the machine does not reac= h the internet. Interestingly on the first login to cerowrt routing seemed = to have worked, but once I applied the set of changes I typically apply to = customize cerowrt for my home network routing somehow went bust. > > I just noticed that the lan and guest zones were empty, so I ant an reass= igned them, but still the connected computers can not reach the internet. I= f there is anything I can do to debug this, please let me know, otherwise I= will ref lash the router back to 3.10.28-16 tomorrow... > > Best Regards > Sebastian > > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html