From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87AB208AB9 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so786846wes.0 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:42:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sKf1tKyUAc8H1ek7gMkELOtAbUGrdLexCfS/AlFfBaw=; b=ocy41RAnlX0k1EeaXxZlHTW6g7EWE6yIgt5II0P7VgSwiAdW1xyl8OLz7NKuM8twK7 6ezB1VsBGtazs1diISPXAIJEugg9T4+mNcC5IxLIckqtH5ED0PH10yvjXmRuGqmly9tW pz2Px+dW5mlJZ3H3aTcjF6O69bKlsE+QGffZMNnUjCZEypkq+PCIQJZrFvFpFjWVrLHd 7LaHI7Rflj3+OmBdaClPzLjF0Ql35nedMj0oyYr07FvcwXZgSXDgS6sfUgFQVL9OXPVQ nYpw23qLD782mJiK/njmYpgmzEgBFyRY1tKnUK5uhjkJJ9Bx73kRcW+4tsPVqhFJUMNF AXzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.184.107 with SMTP id et11mr17661779wic.60.1377110570949; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.48.67 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:42:50 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c227ee65e46a04e4798ae0 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] some kernel updates X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:42:53 -0000 --001a11c227ee65e46a04e4798ae0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It looks like the htb dsl fixes, and the ipv6_subtrees fix, will land in 3.10.9 or later. (they are already patched into my current tree, so yea! I get to rip them out) my thanks to everybody for looking into these problems and to those that fixed them. Too many people to thank here. Now, are there ANY other must-have features that are missing from the present kernel that have gotta get in there? The ONLY other thing that was on my original kernel-feature list for this release of cero was ipv6 NAT support. I'm totally willing to defer that to another release. (Any objections to this idea should come with working packages to kernel and iptables!) I did get a whole bunch of these radios in and I am thinking of trying to make their drivers work, but that's about it http://www.logicsupply.com/products/uwn100 It's based on the MT7601 chipset and my only reason for making 'em work is I'm trying to get up to 30 radios in a tight space so I can look at the dense mesh problem harder. (as well as get a grip on usb interfaces) In addition to 3.10.X in cero and being in sync with openwrt, there's also a much better version of pie than I've had before, a possible enhancement to codel, and I forget what else, in the as yet unreleased devbuild... So: I would really like to freeze on and profile the current kernel at this point. And after that, move to fixing userspace stuff only. I'm aware of a dhcp bug in userspace which is blocking me from getting a release out. (for some reason se00 doesn't get a configuration file entry from the openwrt script) I keep forgetting to add support for not having an outbound or inbound rate limit in the aqm code, too. --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --001a11c227ee65e46a04e4798ae0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It looks like the htb dsl fixes, and the ipv6_subtrees fix= , will land in 3.10.9 or later. (they are already patched into my current t= ree, so yea! I get to rip them out)

my thanks to everybody for looki= ng into these problems and to those that fixed them. Too many people to tha= nk here.

Now, are there ANY other must-have features that are missing from = the present kernel that have gotta get in there?

The ONLY= other thing that was on my original kernel-feature list for this release o= f cero was ipv6 NAT support. I'm totally willing to defer that to anoth= er release. (Any objections to this idea should come with working packages = to kernel and iptables!)

I did get a whole bunch of these radios in and I am thinking= of trying to make their drivers work, but that's about it

http://www.logicsupply.co= m/products/uwn100

It's based on the MT7601 chipse= t


and my only reason for making 'em work is I&#= 39;m trying to get up to 30 radios in a tight space so I can look at the de= nse mesh problem harder. (as well as get a grip on usb interfaces)

In addition to 3.10.X in cero and being in sync with openwrt, there's a= lso a much better version of pie than I've had before, a possible enhan= cement to codel, and I forget what else, in the as yet unreleased devbuild.= ..

So:

I would really like to freeze on and p= rofile the current kernel at this point. And after that, move to fixing use= rspace stuff only.

I'm aware of a dhcp bug in userspace which is= blocking me from getting a release out. (for some reason se00 doesn't = get a configuration file entry from the openwrt script)

I keep forgetting to add support for not having an outbound or inbound = rate limit in the aqm code, too.

--
Dave = T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/ce= rowrt/subscribe.html=20
--001a11c227ee65e46a04e4798ae0--