From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9481A21F1C5 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 03:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m16so1522116vca.30 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 03:22:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dje+OJV90J8pIhwNcs2jFPSh7EpVYif8wcfo0XBbTPA=; b=Rt1X/PtdfcE1Km+Q28VvcFbVbtaw9BDBH2CvJg3lwU5OP95BeSIJZq7M5RApYXeQKA gwht55NWJffxxjCVa1ELbKlXNgODk5izwE4SmJmKCjtgHKyLd4PzPd/oTu6ey7C2VNeU VxzFZ/EzT6Qp3EklSn8Kli3fDd0XbswIrEnSBs5SC5xCFMsHhcuzrgI/q9jEFqETkGxv 2ANx5rG9T1CgRJ8wCldzPf+hP8a8/f60FNLyM2yIhYiHno8hzRYrpT7rdZE1m5jto/Jw 7J293L+Lad4kOku2R7wQZtKhvbi/PCrBIoM9h2e801RhEcR+WPhk4ge9UfT4YU/vrESy TtNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.29.142 with SMTP id k14mr3352212vdh.124.1368008556432; Wed, 08 May 2013 03:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.169.77 with HTTP; Wed, 8 May 2013 03:22:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <518A18FA.4030600@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 03:22:36 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Markus Stenberg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d041c0e561004dc325061 Cc: homenet@ietf.org, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] pushing the bird faster X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 10:22:37 -0000 --20cf307d041c0e561004dc325061 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Markus Stenberg wro= te: > On 8.5.2013, at 12.20, Steven Barth wrote: > > On 08.05.2013 11:07, Dave Taht wrote: > >> Unless you wish to maintain these modifications forever, it is helpful > >> to seek consensus with the mainline developers of these tools to push > >> your patches in a mutually acceptible form. I would suspect that dnsma= sq > >> and odhcp6c devs would be amiable to a discussion at the very least. > > Speaking for odhcp6c I have looked into the homenet changes yesterday > and I don't see it as a big hassle to merge these features into the main > branch at some point once they have an official IANA number and the specs > are somewhat stable. > > > > Also feel free to contact me if you are thinking about getting anything > IPv6-related upstream to OpenWrt and we can discuss that or you can of > course also use the official channels, mailing lists and so on. > > That's underlying problem with both dnsmasq and odhcp6c forked changes - > we use IOS-specific prefix class option # that is NOT from IANA, and I'd > rather not see it in wide use for obvious reasons. > I have few problems with IOS setting a default standard, open source following it, and the IANA blessing it later. :) That said, what is the status of the IANA application? Link? --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --20cf307d041c0e561004dc325061 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Markus S= tenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> wrote:
On 8.5.2013, at 12.20, Steven Barth= <cyrus@openwrt.org> wrote:<= br> > On 08.05.2013 11:07, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Unless you wish to maintain these modifications forever, it is hel= pful
>> to seek consensus with the mainline developers of these tools to p= ush
>> your patches in a mutually acceptible form. I would suspect that d= nsmasq
>> and odhcp6c devs would be amiable to a discussion at the very leas= t.
> Speaking for odhcp6c I have looked into the homenet changes yesterday = and I don't see it as a big hassle to merge these features into the mai= n branch at some point once they have an official IANA number and the specs= are somewhat stable.
>
> Also feel free to contact me if you are thinking about getting anythin= g IPv6-related upstream to OpenWrt and we can discuss that or you can of co= urse also use the official channels, mailing lists and so on.

That's underlying problem with both dnsmasq and odhcp6c for= ked changes - we use IOS-specific prefix class option # that is NOT from IA= NA, and I'd rather not see it in wide use for obvious reasons.

I have few problems with IOS setting a default standa= rd, open source following it, and the IANA blessing it later. :) That said,= what is the status of the IANA application? Link?

--
Dave T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http= ://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=20 --20cf307d041c0e561004dc325061--