From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB40121F0F0 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so10274722ieb.39 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:47:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OmFiVTuGHg0ITnncsORVXsB31GSmanrAd/NHe1YmKPo=; b=vQFWtZlflSqSrZxkSDQfnIWVRYKZ078uNLUArDkZIm9VBgptExyOqKIFbsj9Lc3EE2 HEOhqIU2dWIBUPv5ppswYMogvJl79VYo563U/xQ/+sH0VApSCW3HKcg1Slk5rTIJDn2Z X8I3rwii7sUOYMELqZk81JxCYFkRl5S0nhOqX31tLpEKJ9dqa/Aml55L1YvjXjeWKbQz B+kahq4P0cbw65dc4hAFGgu7HS1/s0mOQcmCqUdYlNH6k0jZS65j/YvYlX764HMuIpHV KQVXS14LCr8qPuJ/hz55vEhVHCPnUUgesv0lQcg3NdCx8QfQJY1urhoBIVS2DMvtzb4K sDiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.88.136 with SMTP id bg8mr9964765igb.96.1358797623110; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:47:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:47:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f235a17a5adc904d3d1b9ff Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.7.3-2 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:47:04 -0000 --e89a8f235a17a5adc904d3d1b9ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And is at: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.7.3-2 + resync with openwrt + uftp4 alpha + quagga update + Hopefully the last ipv6 instruction traps killed (thx ketan and robert!) - I see rngd eating a ton of cpu on a given transfer. I'd been meaning to look at the quality of the new entropy stuff for ages, and have long hoped to be rid of that daemon After we do a bit more testing I'll tag and push the source to this version, and then get cracking on higher layers in the stack again. A bit about uftp4 support. My intent with getting uftp into cerowrt 18 months ago was to have an easy multicast test, which would let someone (for example) set a rate of 1Mbit and observe what happens to a wireless network, observe packet loss at various distances from the AP, etc, as well as get a grip on the timing delays induced by the power save mode in wifi (basically storing all multicast content and broadcasting it as "content after beacon", (CAP, also known colloquially as "crap after beacon"))... Anyway, while I was thinking that as my basic use case in this project... Dennis Bush was actually off making a new version do more useful things. We got to talking last week... I've tried the ipv4 support and it's nifty. Ipv6 didn't work but perhaps my x86 build is bad. --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --e89a8f235a17a5adc904d3d1b9ff Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And is at:

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.7.= 3-2

+ resync with openwrt
+ uftp4 alpha
+ quagga update + Hopefully the last ipv6 instruction traps killed (thx ketan and robert!)<= br>- I see rngd eating a ton of cpu on a given transfer. I'd been meani= ng to look at the quality of the new entropy stuff for ages, and have long = hoped to be rid of that daemon

After we do a bit more testing I'll tag and push the source to this= version, and then get cracking on higher layers in the stack again.
A bit about uftp4 support. My intent with getting uftp into = cerowrt 18 months ago was to have an easy multicast test, which would let s= omeone (for example) set a rate of 1Mbit and observe what happens to a wire= less network, observe packet loss at various distances from the AP, etc, as= well as get a grip on the timing delays induced by the power save mode in = wifi (basically storing all multicast content and broadcasting it as "= content after beacon", (CAP, also known colloquially as "crap aft= er beacon"))...

Anyway, while I was thinking that as my basic use case in this project.= ..

Dennis Bush was actually off making a new version do more useful= things. We got to talking last week... I've tried the ipv4 support and= it's nifty. Ipv6 didn't work but perhaps my x86 build is bad.

--
Dave T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www= .teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=20 --e89a8f235a17a5adc904d3d1b9ff--