From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B87921F1B5 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so1861852wib.16 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:25:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s7CoVpePLhxshxD45dMBZfYxrmgkkKZTNIXfaXj3DIQ=; b=vt8RiqnWCV40edy+DYdgREnIlfCu/8p18He0D369/MZWAM4gL6fgzfIK2yYlQU7ffh PILhhH8OKaVam0K2jcrRr/uklQ1UxutdcLboM8PZLke6vlu6BvT6UKjTG4aeqUycNsFA lsHCHT3VcAhxnwph4CAskAJ4H+qGPySeqmfAAkPz9B6/poYoJCmVkrx6Dvzv5E0kN+gF M+tVR6UMw3powVk8z0/sTP4hn7TQYf5+ED9hAgWjSrkT0VEagfVHlSoHLE4h9whE82uO 5BpsALFaHcH3u2xMfwcymJqV62AlbKRZAPj4W5gqz9UFpHLRISIqzVrUSp3oSRENzwkI MLbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.187.50 with SMTP id fp18mr18722wjc.89.1396128330958; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:25:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <30177.1396127292@sandelman.ca> References: <30456.1396032043@sandelman.ca> <30177.1396127292@sandelman.ca> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:25:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Michael Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: wndr3800 replacement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:25:33 -0000 On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Michael Richardson wrot= e: > > Dave Taht wrote: > >> that is just fine. I don't expect 24-ports of GbE. > >> (I was expecting that cisco switch to do that... sadly no lost pac= kets > >> on a $100 unmanaged FE switch...) > > > I started looking at the edgerouter LTE and related boxes again. > > Does anyone else have one? > > I have ordered the 5-port POE one. Does that support gigabit POE? > My understanding is that it runs Vyatta. I would suspect that given that = the It is running an older version of vyatta, yes. > edgerouter is MIPS, and has "special hardware", that VyOS might not have = the Not sure what the offloads buy you, except added latency. They are easily disabled for testing various qdiscs... (can't remember the command offhand) > right support for that hardware. I'm going to talk to Ubiquity if I can = on > Monday. It might not make sense to run *Wrt on this device, not sure. There is a pretty modern looking up-to-date build of openwrt for the edgerouter, using 3.10, and so on. I am told however, that there are some problems with the toolchain, which show up when you try to use iptables. Haven't tried it myself (my edgerouter is 60km away), and don't know how to flash openwrt onto it in the first place. the current edgerouter firmware (v.1.4.1) is based on 3.4.23, and has all the bugs in the 3.4 series. I backported fq_codel and the latest flow hashing stuff to that version; patch 0013 is a little problematic as yet: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/edgerouter-fq_codel-patches/ > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh netwo= rks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network archite= ct [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails= [ > > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html