From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D956221FB94; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obpn3 with SMTP id n3so94813233obp.0; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:42:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=22lqlBCmT8+MTKihR/0CQW6PTramSGidiOnAInlwTDA=; b=vbY85NUhOoXzkJkp6mRTLoBj1n5ITgXMK24AeRTds8vofCybcabV1Sn6tdVvlPxi19 3hrCLEf/r1MLJBAyBZnLCy9nKtL9LHd6ePDOLNwju67YAD3JweLDVC3u4r0dboqpdBBW 4HsngYKRY2ac3mubcUCO8SXXUZDaLY01msASPgFzj7JRBNB1QbVLn67W4s6AMdMG8YeL 5wbrUjOZ6ms/rAIOB0pAeNKSY46+S/IEBIkTWxWw+L7nsWqoBpfq9W42LvPNyPEUokYv vtTWC8zwrmkTEayrZBC0J0tX87UA8kW4Xp4NmDH8sxjK4eWsiiDKmcg8vyJhRJliv2y4 c0zw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.246.9 with SMTP id xs9mr8712278obc.45.1435534968767; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.107.9 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:42:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] some reference numbers for cake performance on x86_64 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:43:18 -0000 This is a set of two hop (client-server through switch) results, with sch_fq on the nuc client, and cake on the rangeley (ranger) server. Since we seem to be aiming for sane results from the mvneta, at speeds at 500mbit... http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/k500/ Do note that this is a live system with other traffic so it is noisy data. Of note, in looking at this dataset in comparison to mikaels, is that he only got 360mbit bidirectional on rrul_be - where I get full throughput. admittedly he seemed to be running using htb as the rate limiter. Being off by *20%* from the set setting (after subtracting acks) of 500 mbit however, seems to be an issue. I will setup another box to do client - router -server this week. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast