From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26C821F1E4 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq7so712818wib.3 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=K2t9QHWGcDcH0/nqmCvFWdcviO1gB21bi+/U7GHxWFU=; b=0pmb9iOFGHAL2Of6RBCQlq2q1GjKTgfnXtKHjr2+6zNy1hTm1FHrlIU11C4AVnq0fa AmNMxtfOQ/1Ej349xccAoPh/N2YdSU3yJUHYNfE6ley1Ol0zI2ngeAkr719z7/A7KfWI 6kOrwMueS+XRbwByRrbKVisGRuo59WhpvH5WtUbSwFwpWqmOPdoYw+ee+V4XmLH4grSX 3Kcq2Y5c/Vl7xvj4H9SUaCiRdro1S/d1s6vtUGVO1I4r3MdZjuCT2AXKvtSOt37w2AK2 Q015lVwSf9Qj0hJWcsHefzMy0gzFwsmUR28qfwA7wEAuGU6Cz2dnQccNHDLVq1Vw0SQy kUtg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.77.35 with SMTP id p3mr5102438wiw.18.1358532447300; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:07:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.88.197 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:07:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E42ADA4D5@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:07:27 +0000 Message-ID: From: Robert Bradley To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c0644efed7304d393fb8c Cc: Richard Brown , "" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.7.2-3 released, still in a battle with ipv6 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:07:30 -0000 --f46d043c0644efed7304d393fb8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I got this working in much the same way as in earlier builds by adding the following to the top of /etc/dnsmasq.conf and restarting dnsmasq: enable-ra dhcp-range=3Dse00,2001:xx:yy:1::2,2001:xx:yy:1::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h dhcp-range=3Dsw10,2001:xx:yy:2::2,2001:xx:yy:2::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h dhcp-range=3Dsw00,2001:xx:yy:3::2,2001:xx:yy:3::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h dhcp-range=3Dgw00,2001:xx:yy:4::2,2001:xx:yy:4::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h dhcp-range=3Dgw10,2001:xx:yy:5::2,2001:xx:yy:5::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h I have not tried the new automatic setup yet, but this should get DHCPv6 and RA working regardless. Clients should be able to use both DHCPv6 and SLAAC addresses. On 18 January 2013 15:54, Dave Taht wrote: > all: > > Could you post the generated dnsmasq.conf file and your network file and > cc steven barth? > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> There are multiple threads on the stateless dhcp and dhcp implementation >> going on here: >> >> >> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q1/thread.h= tml >> >> among other things, "enable-ra" should be getting set in the generated >> dnsmasq conf file and probably isn't right now. Perhaps it can be manual= ly >> set? >> >> I'm hoping ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really >> wasn't planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO car= e >> about exercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are >> still a few new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 41= 9) >> >> (dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assign the delegated prefi= x) >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Richard Brown < >> Rich.Brown@intermapper.com> wrote: >> >>> Dave, Maciej, >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:47 PM, < >>> cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Maciej Soltysiak >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I configured he.net tunnel according to >>>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 and works with latest 3.7.2-4= . >>>> >>>> However I don't understand how my client is supposed get an ip6 >>>> address. radvd is gone and I don't see anything handing out me an ip6 = addr. >>>> Who's job is it now then? >>>> >>> >>> dnsmasq is supposed to do the job now, but the configuration via >>> openwrt's >>> config is in flux. There is documentation floating about on >>> dnsmasq-discuss as well as inside the the dnsmasq-2.66test10 tarball on= how >>> to do it at the command line.... >>> >>> >>> I have the same problem with 3.7.2-4: my HE.net connection works fine, >>> CeroWrt gets the expected global IPv6 addresses, and each of the five >>> interfaces (not but not the babel ones) get nice routed global addresse= s >>> allocated from my /48. >>> >>> But my Mac (using either wired or wireless) doesn't get a v6 address. >>> Do you have any links to the dnsmasq documentation (a quick google didn= 't >>> turn up anything.) Thanks. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --=20 Robert Bradley --f46d043c0644efed7304d393fb8c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I got this working in much the same way as in earlier= builds by adding the following to the top of /etc/dnsmasq.conf and restart= ing dnsmasq:

enable-ra
dhcp-range=3Dse00,2001:xx:yy:1::2,2001:xx:= yy:1::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-range=3Dsw10,2001:xx:yy:2::2,2001:xx:yy:2::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp= -range=3Dsw00,2001:xx:yy:3::2,2001:xx:yy:3::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-ran= ge=3Dgw00,2001:xx:yy:4::2,2001:xx:yy:4::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-range= =3Dgw10,2001:xx:yy:5::2,2001:xx:yy:5::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h

I have not tried the new automatic setup yet, but this should get= DHCPv6 and RA working regardless.=C2=A0 Clients should be able to use both= DHCPv6 and SLAAC addresses.


On 18 January 2013 15:54, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> = wrote:
all:

Could you post the generated dnsmasq.conf fil= e and your network file and cc steven barth?


On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:26 A= M, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
There are multiple threads on the stateless = dhcp and dhcp implementation going on here:


among other things, "enable-ra" should be get= ting set in the generated dnsmasq conf file and probably isn't right no= w. Perhaps it can be manually set?=C2=A0

I'm h= oping ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really wasn'= ;t planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO care about= exercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are still a f= ew new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 419)

(dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assig= n the delegated prefix)

On Fri,= Jan 18, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Richard Brown <Rich.Brown@intermapper.c= om> wrote:
Dave, Maciej,

On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:47 PM, <cerowrt-devel-request@lists.buf= ferbloat.net>=C2=A0=C2=A0wrote:

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Maciej Soltysiak=C2=A0<maciej@soltysiak.com>=C2=A0wrote:
Hi, I configured=C2=A0he.net=C2=A0tunnel according to=C2=A0= http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6=C2=A0and works with latest 3.7.2-4.
=C2=A0
However I don't understand how my client is supposed get an ip6 ad= dress. radvd is gone and I don't see anything handing out me an ip6 add= r. Who's job is it now then?

dnsmasq is supposed to do the job now, but the configuration via openwrt= 9;s
config is in flux. There is documentation floating about on dnsmasq-discuss= as well as inside the the dnsmasq-2.66test10 tarball on how to do it at th= e command line....

I have the same problem with 3.7.2-4: my HE.net connection works fine, CeroWrt gets the expected = global IPv6 addresses, and each of the five interfaces (not but not the bab= el ones) get nice routed global addresses allocated from my /48.

But my Mac (using either wired or wireless) doesn't get a v6 addre= ss. Do you have any links to the dnsmasq documentation (a quick google didn= 't turn up anything.) Thanks.

Rich

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Ce= rowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel




-- <= br>Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.tekl= ibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=20



--
Dave T=C3=A4= ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowr= t/subscribe.html=20

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel




--
Robert Bradley --f46d043c0644efed7304d393fb8c--