* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces [not found] ` <CAA93jw6R_fLHhkE+kU+Q=5xKM0t1Sf93_Sa74HyWCQXGYw3gHA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-12-10 8:40 ` Dave Taht [not found] ` <50C59F7A.7000508@openwrt.org> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2012-12-10 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel; +Cc: cerowrt-users I just noticed that this went to cerowrt-users. There aren't a whole lot of people on that list and this stuff is in heavy development so, forwarding the thread here.... On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head) > version of openwrt, fairly soon. It deserves to die... > > There is going to be a merger of the DHCPv6/SLAAC and naming > functionalities in dnsmasq and the dynamicism of the new ipv6-support > package, which also includes a spanking new dhcpv6-pd client.. > > Also planned is to (once the 3.7 kernel lands) make npt66 the default > (for most users). So in a couple weeks, all the underlying ipv6 > infrastructure in openwrt and cerowrt is going to change. > > As to whether the 6in4 case is fully handled as of now in that system, > damned if I know. Same goes for 6to4... I put the ipv6-support package > into cerowrt 3.6.9-5, all forms of ipv6 are blocked at the lincs lab, > can't test it, right now. > > As for how to fix it in cerowrt 3.3.8, it was always problematic as > hell, and I'm glad the work is being re-architected in BB by two of > the most competent people I know, and I've signed cerowrt (and thus, > y'all) up to test it when it comes out. It would be great to recruit > more help, because *this time* we're going to get it right, come hell > or high water. > > I'm very pleased, in particular, with dnsmasq's naming support for > slaac. It "just works". > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote: >> >> First question, why are there two radvd processes? >> >> 3343 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys >> 3345 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys >> >> Is this just a thread issue? >> >> second question, none of my custom interfaces are in /var/etc/radvd.conf? >> >> Can I hack /etc/config/firewall directly rather than go through the UI? >> I think so....? >> >> Could I attach blinking LEDs to VLANs? >> (ps: whatever problems I had with ethernet mii between my cerowrt and >> a cisco 200-26 switch in the summer, seems to have gone away) >> >> On an IPv6 interface which is not my uplink, I think that IPv6 gateway >> should be blank. That the router should advertise iself. >> >> I also think that the words "Send router soliciations" is wrong, that it >> should say, "Send router advertisements". >> >> I had to put my custom interfaces into /etc/config/radvd. >> >> config interface >> option interface 'trusted' >> option AdvSendAdvert '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '1' >> option AdvLinkMTU '1480' >> option ignore '0' >> option IgnoreIfMissing '1' >> option AdvSourceLLAddress '1' >> option AdvDefaultPreference 'medium' >> option AdvOtherConfigFlag '1' >> >> config prefix >> option interface 'trusted' >> list prefix '' >> option AdvOnLink '1' >> option AdvAutonomous '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '0' >> option ignore '0' >> >> I don't see a place in the UI where this is edited, but I could be >> missing it. >> >> -- >> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ >> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ >> ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ >> Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> >> then sign the petition. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <50C59F7A.7000508@openwrt.org>]
* [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces [not found] ` <50C59F7A.7000508@openwrt.org> @ 2012-12-10 8:45 ` Dave Taht 2012-12-10 13:53 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Robert Bradley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2012-12-10 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-devel ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Steven Barth Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces To: cerowrt-users <cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net> Fyi I've commited a new ipv6-support version to OpenWrt yesterday. This includes (partly untested) all features I want to see in there for OpenWrt except the integration of dnsmasq-dhcpv6 (which will follow later once the dynamic configuration features have been added to it) and the WebUI which is still on the ToDo. So far the current IPv6-featureset is: * Support for native IPv6 with static configuration * Support for native IPv6 with DHCPv6-Prefix Delegation * Support for native IPv6 without PD via relaying or masquerading * Support for 6in4, 6to4 and 6rd * Prefixes are automatically split up and distributed over downstream-interfaces OR by choice mapped to an ULA-address (NPT66). Help, documentation and configuration examples for yesterdays version can be found here (there were a few changes for the new NPT-support): http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 Especially the NPT / NAT-related stuff has seen very little testing and of course only works with a Kernel >= 3.7 and ip6tables >= 1.4.17. On 10.12.2012 08:56, Dave Taht wrote: > > Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head) > version of openwrt, fairly soon. It deserves to die... > > There is going to be a merger of the DHCPv6/SLAAC and naming > functionalities in dnsmasq and the dynamicism of the new ipv6-support > package, which also includes a spanking new dhcpv6-pd client.. > > Also planned is to (once the 3.7 kernel lands) make npt66 the default > (for most users). So in a couple weeks, all the underlying ipv6 > infrastructure in openwrt and cerowrt is going to change. > > As to whether the 6in4 case is fully handled as of now in that system, > damned if I know. Same goes for 6to4... I put the ipv6-support package > into cerowrt 3.6.9-5, all forms of ipv6 are blocked at the lincs lab, > can't test it, right now. > > As for how to fix it in cerowrt 3.3.8, it was always problematic as > hell, and I'm glad the work is being re-architected in BB by two of > the most competent people I know, and I've signed cerowrt (and thus, > y'all) up to test it when it comes out. It would be great to recruit > more help, because *this time* we're going to get it right, come hell > or high water. > > I'm very pleased, in particular, with dnsmasq's naming support for > slaac. It "just works". > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote: >> >> >> First question, why are there two radvd processes? >> >> 3343 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys >> 3345 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys >> >> Is this just a thread issue? >> >> second question, none of my custom interfaces are in /var/etc/radvd.conf? >> >> Can I hack /etc/config/firewall directly rather than go through the UI? >> I think so....? >> >> Could I attach blinking LEDs to VLANs? >> (ps: whatever problems I had with ethernet mii between my cerowrt and >> a cisco 200-26 switch in the summer, seems to have gone away) >> >> On an IPv6 interface which is not my uplink, I think that IPv6 gateway >> should be blank. That the router should advertise iself. >> >> I also think that the words "Send router soliciations" is wrong, that it >> should say, "Send router advertisements". >> >> I had to put my custom interfaces into /etc/config/radvd. >> >> config interface >> option interface 'trusted' >> option AdvSendAdvert '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '1' >> option AdvLinkMTU '1480' >> option ignore '0' >> option IgnoreIfMissing '1' >> option AdvSourceLLAddress '1' >> option AdvDefaultPreference 'medium' >> option AdvOtherConfigFlag '1' >> >> config prefix >> option interface 'trusted' >> list prefix '' >> option AdvOnLink '1' >> option AdvAutonomous '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '0' >> option ignore '0' >> >> I don't see a place in the UI where this is edited, but I could be >> missing it. >> >> -- >> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ >> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ >> ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ >> Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> >> then sign the petition. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > > > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-users mailing list Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces [not found] ` <50C59F7A.7000508@openwrt.org> 2012-12-10 8:45 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: " Dave Taht @ 2012-12-10 13:53 ` Robert Bradley 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Robert Bradley @ 2012-12-10 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cerowrt-users, cerowrt-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 639 bytes --] On 10 December 2012 08:38, Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org> wrote: > > So far the current IPv6-featureset is: > > * Support for native IPv6 with static configuration > * Support for native IPv6 with DHCPv6-Prefix Delegation > * Support for native IPv6 without PD via relaying or masquerading > * Support for 6in4, 6to4 and 6rd > * Prefixes are automatically split up and distributed over > downstream-interfaces OR by choice mapped to an ULA-address (NPT66). > Out of interest, what benefit is there to using NPT66? I understand that people seem to want it, just not what you gain over advertising multiple prefixes. -- Robert Bradley [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 955 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-10 13:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <24882.1355094243@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw6R_fLHhkE+kU+Q=5xKM0t1Sf93_Sa74HyWCQXGYw3gHA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-12-10 8:40 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces Dave Taht
[not found] ` <50C59F7A.7000508@openwrt.org>
2012-12-10 8:45 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: " Dave Taht
2012-12-10 13:53 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Robert Bradley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox