Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Bradley <robert.bradley1@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.3.6-2
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:11:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA=Zby7hmoZdZrmERNfbYbDm6C6eCWU2KcSEr96iQisZLzDMGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61BEA217-79A6-47C8-888D-101BC0EAFB45@gmx.de>

On 25 May 2012 07:41, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> since I see the same log file on my router as Jim, I just want to report
> my observations below.
>
> On May 24, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Robert Bradley wrote:
<snip>
(re. guest interfaces on wireless)
> > Are these disabled on your routers at the moment?  I suppose in the
> > worst case you could try setting an explicit channel for both of the
> > non-mesh guest interfaces and see if the logs clear up (or somehow pass "-L
> > /dev/null" to babeld).
>
>        After setting the 2.4GHz channel to 1 instead of auto
> /tmp/babeld.log still grows with the same entries. And on a WNDR3700v2 there
> are 30840 KB of tmpfs on /tmp so the babeld.log size of 256KB should not by
> itself cause the router to crash. That said, while testing this hypothesis
> by filling most of /tmp (dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/delete_me bs=1024
> count=30000, so that around 340KB stayed free) the router reliably went
> first into OOM and the rebooted itself. Might it be that the size of the
> /tmp filesystem is too large if actually used? If I naively add the VSZs of
> most processes I end up at around 90% of available memory, so worst case
> there actually only seems to be room for a much smaller /tmp than 30MB. .
> Maybe restricting /tmp to 6000 KB might make this problem go away (or
> hooking up a swap device). Does this reasoning sound sane? Once I figure out
> how to reduce the size of /tmp I will test this.
>

Using "mount -o remount -o size=6000k /tmp" should apparently work for
that.  The reasoning sounds good to me, too.  That said, unless we can
find an obvious reason for /tmp overfilling, I'm not sure we should do
that, since it will cause problems upgrading.  There's also the issue
that in bug #379, only wireless traffic caused problems.  I think that
even if excessive logs are the problem, the real issue must be
somewhere within the wireless driver, but I could well be wrong...

I'm thinking that maybe flooding wireless->wired with UDP traffic for
5-10 minutes is the right approach, and then vice-versa (restarting
the router inbetween?).  If there are problems like infinite retries
or packet memory leaks, that might show them up quickly.

--
Robert Bradley

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-25 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <00404BC8-3761-409D-A1C8-9213D7D9A3DF@gmx.de>
2012-05-24  3:48 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: 3.3.6-2 Sebastian Moeller
2012-05-24 15:44   ` Robert Bradley
2012-05-24 16:18     ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-05-24 16:32       ` Jim Gettys
2012-05-24 18:12         ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-05-24 18:15           ` Jim Gettys
2012-05-24 18:58             ` Robert Bradley
2012-05-25  6:41               ` [Cerowrt-devel] 3.3.6-2 Sebastian Moeller
2012-05-25  7:02                 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-25 11:11                 ` Robert Bradley [this message]
2012-05-25 18:25                   ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-05-25 22:38                     ` Robert Bradley
2012-06-02  7:03                       ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-06-03 22:24                         ` Robert Bradley
2012-06-06 23:03                           ` Sebastian Moeller
2012-05-25  0:04             ` [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: 3.3.6-2 Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA=Zby7hmoZdZrmERNfbYbDm6C6eCWU2KcSEr96iQisZLzDMGQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=robert.bradley1@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox