From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EEB21F196 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m20so9940318qcx.10 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 07:36:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OrZTO9jSFH/uSK5kKV0Zxtuj/0bl40fuGMB12nRiGY8=; b=JgbHN+enzN+2wGrU4F31X9c95OrSKpzNIAdMwa8TBJR8V1YLio5zfHhJO78XtNaejM Xfo2a273a3V0v5vwVJu2xsbQR4PaEkgH1/ns3X8QrP8JZzKUJ7+WZxQETfTtLv/4h9/r gvn4D2Zw0fQoS/Y4sHdEvO62G9Zd8Ge2wJfAjv0/hRPPWljuAmodqxNqiYsvSdqqCTSH 1heA4vXLQBbcUYnkkDA+8RRp5PpwSvOWqtN0stSWFCNWD0yALoFsqL8rAEw6aFpD1wT/ YhqVUbyUCzwfwWnXG6ES7pqpCQNto2Xn5AQtzMQvxWwOHUeC+eWGHcCu/pjXTb3FscPJ xO8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.104.230 with SMTP id a93mr1880755qgf.113.1395239819513; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 07:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.85.85 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 07:36:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874n2uqt6e.fsf@toke.dk> References: <874n2uqt6e.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:36:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ernesto Elias To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113535aad1964f04f4f695ba Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problem with Verizon fios router X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:37:00 -0000 --001a113535aad1964f04f4f695ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok everyone good news! I've managed to make cero the primary router with ethernet from ont to cero then from the lan port of cero to the wan port of the actiontec and I checked on the stb and I am able to go to video on demand with no problem at all! Because I would rather much have the wndr3800 route all the traffic and not actiontec! so thanks everyone for your cooperation! :D On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen w= rote: > Ernesto Elias writes: > > > And Dave I am currently using cero that way, the WAN port of cero is > > connected through the Lan port of the actiontec but if I try to bridge > > the actiontec I will lose on demand. > > FWIW I've seen a similar setup where TV is provided by a set-top box > that connects via the internet connection. I managed for a while to get > it to work, but the provider has since changed the setup so the set-top > box only works when plugged directly into the provider-supplied router. > > What did work for a while was proxying IGMP traffic from the LAN side of > the cerowrt box. The set-top box worked by subscribing to a multicast > stream in the provider's network, and having cerowrt proxy the > subscription requests worked (for a while). Theoretically, pimd should > do this, but as I recall I had to switch to igmpproxy to get it to work. > > This was not on-demand, but rather streaming IPTV, so it might be a > different setup for you. Just thought I'd mention it as a data point... := ) > > -Toke > --001a113535aad1964f04f4f695ba Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok everyone good news! I've managed to make cero the p= rimary router with ethernet from ont to cero then from the lan port of cero= to the wan port of the actiontec and I checked on the stb and I am able to= go to video on demand with no problem at all! Because I would rather much = have the wndr3800 route all the traffic and not actiontec! so thanks everyo= ne for your cooperation! :D


On Wed, Mar 1= 9, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> wro= te:
Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> writes:

> And Dave I am currently using cero that way, the WAN port of cero is > connected through the Lan port of the actiontec but if I try to bridge=
> the actiontec I will lose on demand.

FWIW I've seen a similar setup where TV is provided by a set-top = box
that connects via the internet connection. I managed for a while to get
it to work, but the provider has since changed the setup so the set-top
box only works when plugged directly into the provider-supplied router.

What did work for a while was proxying IGMP traffic from the LAN side of the cerowrt box. The set-top box worked by subscribing to a multicast
stream in the provider's network, and having cerowrt proxy the
subscription requests worked (for a while). Theoretically, pimd should
do this, but as I recall I had to switch to igmpproxy to get it to work.
This was not on-demand, but rather streaming IPTV, so it might be a
different setup for you. Just thought I'd mention it as a data point...= :)

-Toke

--001a113535aad1964f04f4f695ba--