root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh
2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 streams down a                                                                                                                                                             nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 seconds.
 Download:  30.49 Mbps
   Upload:  46.52 Mbps
  Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
      Min: 19.848
    10pct: 19.958
   Median: 20.743
      Avg: 21.229
    90pct: 22.739
      Max: 30.491
root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh
2014-10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 streams down a                                                                                                                                                             nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 seconds.
 Download:  7.02 Mbps
   Upload:  63.68 Mbps
  Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
      Min: 21.690
    10pct: 117.997
   Median: 153.983
      Avg: 150.851
    90pct: 180.777
      Max: 190.265


The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink and the second results are for only shaping the downlink...

and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and uplink when I was testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I was shaping it for the test. Am I doing it right ?

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload only, then measure.

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was trying to figure out what
> should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw that the wndr3800 tops out at
> 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As of now I have it at 25/25
> on the page. Is that right or should I just shape the upload?
>
> On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they had
>> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
>>
>>
>> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
>>
>> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we start
>> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can tell.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone!
>> > I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back to the
>> > older
>> > submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for it. But in
>> > my
>> > search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I seen
>> > about
>> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just
>> > wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have verizon
>> > fios
>> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks



--
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks