From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D8D21F1A4 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z60so2577663qgd.19 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:16:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nxOfTH4Q3gWq1jrSBm+uXDlO3jIzAB86Xyp+zRuPIhQ=; b=x934K8vR+z2TeWBA5yWT2pXbBvtMWy7izYtRzeZsvcHbBeaHgo1xAPiqOan71p3hGh S03gdJOUzp0YxgNNxkCOgv8TfybM40w6MGr1cYGOi4yYPrWJPm2nsDMxiI0TO+1mtXmc LiJxRqWTEvs284NFjnCiLKTXh6oxeppXkxNt947jk9o3zhW0iOO4fP0pj8+twKKBX/wj QGOGa8sDgHt9rOXxBuIyHaIwH6NwtyBKG7GOjj/A0/WviFtHZm+EiEsi8KX6r14jDCmw bbGQPW4tFshDd2mYa5LNFdBVYBmExKmmrUxCDb9fN0AvrO34D8/V0LHWHgWhIQuRFyGG 05+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.120.1 with SMTP id b1mr30184869qar.19.1413746191359; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.102.197 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:16:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 15:16:31 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ernesto Elias To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d6e689e3860505cb6fd1 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:17:01 -0000 --001a11c2d6e689e3860505cb6fd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh 2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 streams down a nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 seconds. Download: 30.49 Mbps Upload: 46.52 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 19.848 10pct: 19.958 Median: 20.743 Avg: 21.229 90pct: 22.739 Max: 30.491 root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh 2014-10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 streams down a nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 seconds. Download: 7.02 Mbps Upload: 63.68 Mbps Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) Min: 21.690 10pct: 117.997 Median: 153.983 Avg: 150.851 90pct: 180.777 Max: 190.265 The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink and the second results are for only shaping the downlink... and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and uplink when I was testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I was shaping it for the test. Am I doing it right ? On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload only, then measur= e. > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias > wrote: > > Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was trying to figure out wh= at > > should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw that the wndr3800 tops > out at > > 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As of now I have it at > 25/25 > > on the page. Is that right or should I just shape the upload? > > > > On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" wrote: > >> > >> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they had > >> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem. > >> > >> > >> > http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizo= n-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down > >> > >> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we start > >> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can tell. > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias < > ernestogelias@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hello everyone! > >> > I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back to t= he > >> > older > >> > submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for it. Bu= t > in > >> > my > >> > search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I seen > >> > about > >> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just > >> > wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have verizo= n > >> > fios > >> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much! > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dave T=C3=A4ht > >> > >> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > --001a11c2d6e689e3860505cb6fd1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner= .sh
2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 streams down a =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 seconds.
=C2=A0Download: =C2=A03= 0.49 Mbps
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Upload: =C2=A046.52 Mbps
=C2=A0 = Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 Min: 19.848
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 10pct: 19.958
=C2=A0 =C2= =A0Median: 20.743
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Avg: 21.229
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 90pct: 22.739
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Max: 30.491
root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh
2014-= 10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.b= ufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 streams down a =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Tak= es about 60 seconds.
=C2=A0Download: =C2=A07.02 Mbps
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0Upload: =C2=A063.68 Mbps
=C2=A0 Latency: (in msec, 6= 1 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Min: 21.690
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 10pct: 117.997
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Median: 153.983
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Avg: 150.851
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 90pct: 1= 80.777
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Max: 190.265


The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink and th= e second results are for only shaping the downlink...

<= div>and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and uplink when I w= as testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I was shaping it fo= r the test. Am I doing it right ?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht <= dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload only, then measure= .

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was trying to figure out w= hat
> should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw that the wndr3800 tops = out at
> 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As of now I have it at = 25/25
> on the page. Is that right or should I just shape the upload?
>
> On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that the= y had
>> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
>>
>>
>> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Ve= rizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
>>
>> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we star= t
>> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can te= ll.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone!
>> > I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went ba= ck to the
>> > older
>> > submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for= it. But in
>> > my
>> > search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From = what I seen
>> > about
>> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I= 'm just
>> > wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have= verizon
>> > fios
>> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> > Cerowr= t-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel<= /a>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave T=C3=A4ht
>>
>> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/U= pcoming_Talks



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_T= alks

--001a11c2d6e689e3860505cb6fd1--