Hello Sebastian, well I followed your directions and when I inputted the command git clone git at https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper It said too many arguments... What do I do now? On Oct 21, 2014 4:23 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" wrote: > Hi Ernesto, > > so I would recommend to first install git from a terminal in your ubuntu > virtual machine: > sudo apt-get install git > > then create a directory where to store horse netperf-wrapper: > mkdir -p ~/bufferbloat ; cd ~/bufferbloat > > then clone the netperf-wrapper repository: > git clone git@https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper > > now you can test what is missing by calling: > ./netperf-wrapper > this will most likely complain about missing components, please send the > output of this command so we can take it from there. > > In the unexpected case that the above command just success please try: > date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ; ./netperf-wrapper > --ipv4 -l 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scaled > --disable-log -t netperf-wrapper_test > > and again send the output… > > And finally if all the above succeeds please try > ./netperf-wrapper —gui > > and send the output > > Hope that helps... > > Best Regards > Sebastian > > > > On Oct 21, 2014, at 04:30 , Ernesto Elias wrote: > > > Alright Sebastian, I've managed to get the virtual box and Ubuntu > running on the computer and I went to go see the packages I have no idea > which one to install there's a whole lot of them. Forgive me this is all > new to me. Which one do I acquire and how to install it? > > > > On Oct 20, 2014 4:11 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" wrote: > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > On Oct 20, 2014, at 03:08 , Ernesto Elias > wrote: > > > > > > > > Well Sebastian sir, I am taking your advice and I'm on windows 7 so > right now I'm downloading virtualbox and xubuntu. I don't know if there is > one that you guys recommend. > > > > I only tested ubuntu 12.04LTS, but certainly I would try the > current 14.07 LTS today. > > > > > Well... I am new to all this stuff so I'm asking you to please help > me on the subject like after everything is up and running on the computer, > > > > Oh, sure I am happy to help you with getting better data ;) > > > > > what other steps do I do afterwards and forgive me like I said I'm new > ot all this stuff because I want to be able to find my link capacity when > using SQM. and Thanks for the help! > > > > First step is getting the vitalized linux up and running, then > python 2.7 (I assume that python will be part of the distribution), with > matplotlib; and finally netperf-wrapper. I assume it might take a bit > trying to figure out all the required packets installed, but it should be > reasonably quick to get this up and running… Just give it a try and let me > know if/where you get stuck > > It would be most excellent if you could document the whole > procedure somehow so we could put it somewhere on the net to make it easier > in the future... > > > > Best Regards > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Sebastian Moeller > wrote: > > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > > > I would recommend to not run the netperf processes on the router you > want to assess, if possible. Shaping at the rates you are interested in > probably will take 100% CPU of the router, so there is no slack for running > net server and netperf instances at the same time. Also I would recommend > to use netperf-wrapper (https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper) > instead of netperfrunner.sh as it allows so much nicer visualization of the > queueing over time. netperfrunner.sh is great tool for quick testing and > figuring out link capacities and worst case latency under load increase > (LULI), but for more thorough comparisons it ain’t made. Netperf-wrapper > will run under linux and macosx natively, but will also run (well enough) > in a linux virtual machine on a windows box. > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > On Oct 19, 2014, at 21:16 , Ernesto Elias > wrote: > > > > > > > root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh > > > > 2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 > streams down a > > nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 > seconds. > > > > Download: 30.49 Mbps > > > > Upload: 46.52 Mbps > > > > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > > > > Min: 19.848 > > > > 10pct: 19.958 > > > > Median: 20.743 > > > > Avg: 21.229 > > > > 90pct: 22.739 > > > > Max: 30.491 > > > > root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh > > > > 2014-10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 > streams down a > > nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 > seconds. > > > > Download: 7.02 Mbps > > > > Upload: 63.68 Mbps > > > > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > > > > Min: 21.690 > > > > 10pct: 117.997 > > > > Median: 153.983 > > > > Avg: 150.851 > > > > 90pct: 180.777 > > > > Max: 190.265 > > > > > > > > > > > > The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink and the second > results are for only shaping the downlink... > > > > > > > > and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and uplink when > I was testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I was shaping it > for the test. Am I doing it right ? > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht > wrote: > > > > shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload only, then > measure. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias < > ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was trying to figure > out what > > > > > should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw that the wndr3800 > tops out at > > > > > 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As of now I have it > at 25/25 > > > > > on the page. Is that right or should I just shape the upload? > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they > had > > > > >> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down > > > > >> > > > > >> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we > start > > > > >> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can > tell. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias < > ernestogelias@gmail.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > Hello everyone! > > > > >> > I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back > to the > > > > >> > older > > > > >> > submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for > it. But in > > > > >> > my > > > > >> > search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I > seen > > > > >> > about > > > > >> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm > just > > > > >> > wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have > verizon > > > > >> > fios > > > > >> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much! > > > > >> > > > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > > >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Dave Täht > > > > >> > > > > >> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Dave Täht > > > > > > > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > > > > >