From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (mail-yh0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2288221F455 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z6so876433yhz.2 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=u419E0zn/6M6TNHhacFaWeDhNd5FAhy7fQOmKLYPXGM=; b=SUNJBlIdj0b6HhXq04cRyXieTPl1XXI+ZVeHHhFbpJ6f+CbWdc1wGyIZmKtRuuq3zQ Lmbg6aIQQy6kx8bRLgwwVG14fS5xJr9tmJeAkqoFn/On/CXCbv6PvT2H7LEDMz3GWHNi WuhkhXSqnEo31STBB2KGaTus2HAdIa8jte4HeW9AcJiyJeiTlDKh9A5t5mF6MKaRwVTW y/Leoy1cvrPNsmO0RVldArFY3EWPm7hzPjjbOo0LA7GC44icK+jvwH+qCmv4B9SgtJne VBvlPtVT/3YcSp+GC7AoN1xlL/m7tp6X5PIcZKVF8fJbC1TMXmNB2iM8BQVU9IOrdOLh OOxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.152.135 with SMTP id t129mr359234ykc.66.1414101796502; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.102.197 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:03:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0F4BF1C4-80DA-4294-9805-9F9CDD1C1D46@gmx.de> References: <50532110-829A-4798-AD58-A726129FCE7D@gmx.de> <348A02AF-6AEC-4D3D-8284-AC472BCD6A49@gmx.de> <0F4BF1C4-80DA-4294-9805-9F9CDD1C1D46@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:03:16 +0000 Message-ID: From: Ernesto Elias To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139ca9a41c1f005061e3b19 Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:03:46 -0000 --001a1139ca9a41c1f005061e3b19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello again Sebastian, this is the output that i have gotten when entering the command and following your directions ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bufferbloat$ date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ; ./netperf-wrapper --ipv4 -L 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scaled --disable-Log -t netperf-wrapper_test Thu Oct 23 21:55:09 UTC 2014 PING kau.toke.dk (130.243.26.64) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D249 time=3D107 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D3 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D4 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D5 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D6 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D7 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D8 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D9 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D10 ttl=3D249 time=3D112 ms --- kau.toke.dk ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev =3D 105.529/106.794/112.146/1.870 ms bash: ./netperf-wrapper: Is a directory ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bufferbloat$ date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ; ./netperf-wrapper --ipv4 -L 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scaled --disable-Log -t netperf-wrapper_test Thu Oct 23 21:57:19 UTC 2014 PING kau.toke.dk (130.243.26.64) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D3 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D4 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D5 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D6 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D7 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D8 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D9 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms 64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D10 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms --- kau.toke.dk ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev =3D 105.008/105.570/106.151/0.559 ms bash: ./netperf-wrapper: Is a directory and this is the output of what you told me to put of what Dave recommended ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bufferbloat$ sudo apt-get install fping python-qt4 python-matplotlib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package fping E: Unable to locate package python-matplotlib On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Ernesto, > > > > On Oct 22, 2014, at 21:39 , Ernesto Elias wrote= : > > > Hello Sebastian, well I followed your directions and when I inputted th= e > command git clone git at https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper > > Oops, sorry, it looks I copy and pasted the wrong line from my > .bash_history=E2=80=A6 the following should work: > > git clone https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper > > also note Dave=E2=80=99s mail where he recommends: > sudo apt-get install fping python-qt4 python-matplotlib > > to get more of the requirements for netperf-wrapper installed, please ru= n > this after coning the netperf-wrapper repository. > > Thanks a lot=E2=80=A6 > > Sebastian > > > > > > It said too many arguments... > > What do I do now? > > > > On Oct 21, 2014 4:23 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" wrote: > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > so I would recommend to first install git from a terminal in your ubunt= u > virtual machine: > > sudo apt-get install git > > > > then create a directory where to store horse netperf-wrapper: > > mkdir -p ~/bufferbloat ; cd ~/bufferbloat > > > > then clone the netperf-wrapper repository: > > git clone git@https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper > > > > now you can test what is missing by calling: > > ./netperf-wrapper > > this will most likely complain about missing components, please send th= e > output of this command so we can take it from there. > > > > In the unexpected case that the above command just success please try: > > date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ; > ./netperf-wrapper --ipv4 -l 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p > all_scaled --disable-log -t netperf-wrapper_test > > > > and again send the output=E2=80=A6 > > > > And finally if all the above succeeds please try > > ./netperf-wrapper =E2=80=94gui > > > > and send the output > > > > Hope that helps... > > > > Best Regards > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 2014, at 04:30 , Ernesto Elias > wrote: > > > > > Alright Sebastian, I've managed to get the virtual box and Ubuntu > running on the computer and I went to go see the packages I have no idea > which one to install there's a whole lot of them. Forgive me this is all > new to me. Which one do I acquire and how to install it? > > > > > > On Oct 20, 2014 4:11 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" wrote: > > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > > > On Oct 20, 2014, at 03:08 , Ernesto Elias > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Well Sebastian sir, I am taking your advice and I'm on windows 7 so > right now I'm downloading virtualbox and xubuntu. I don't know if there i= s > one that you guys recommend. > > > > > > I only tested ubuntu 12.04LTS, but certainly I would try the > current 14.07 LTS today. > > > > > > > Well... I am new to all this stuff so I'm asking you to please hel= p > me on the subject like after everything is up and running on the computer= , > > > > > > Oh, sure I am happy to help you with getting better data ;) > > > > > > > what other steps do I do afterwards and forgive me like I said I'm > new ot all this stuff because I want to be able to find my link capacity > when using SQM. and Thanks for the help! > > > > > > First step is getting the vitalized linux up and running, the= n > python 2.7 (I assume that python will be part of the distribution), with > matplotlib; and finally netperf-wrapper. I assume it might take a bit > trying to figure out all the required packets installed, but it should be > reasonably quick to get this up and running=E2=80=A6 Just give it a try a= nd let me > know if/where you get stuck > > > It would be most excellent if you could document the whole > procedure somehow so we could put it somewhere on the net to make it easi= er > in the future... > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Sebastian Moeller > wrote: > > > > Hi Ernesto, > > > > > > > > I would recommend to not run the netperf processes on the router yo= u > want to assess, if possible. Shaping at the rates you are interested in > probably will take 100% CPU of the router, so there is no slack for runni= ng > net server and netperf instances at the same time. Also I would recommend > to use netperf-wrapper (https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper) > instead of netperfrunner.sh as it allows so much nicer visualization of t= he > queueing over time. netperfrunner.sh is great tool for quick testing and > figuring out link capacities and worst case latency under load increase > (LULI), but for more thorough comparisons it ain=E2=80=99t made. Netperf-= wrapper > will run under linux and macosx natively, but will also run (well enough) > in a linux virtual machine on a windows box. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 19, 2014, at 21:16 , Ernesto Elias > wrote: > > > > > > > > > root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh > > > > > 2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 > streams down a > > nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 > seconds. > > > > > Download: 30.49 Mbps > > > > > Upload: 46.52 Mbps > > > > > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > > > > > Min: 19.848 > > > > > 10pct: 19.958 > > > > > Median: 20.743 > > > > > Avg: 21.229 > > > > > 90pct: 22.739 > > > > > Max: 30.491 > > > > > root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh > > > > > 2014-10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4 > streams down a > > nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60 > seconds. > > > > > Download: 7.02 Mbps > > > > > Upload: 63.68 Mbps > > > > > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > > > > > Min: 21.690 > > > > > 10pct: 117.997 > > > > > Median: 153.983 > > > > > Avg: 150.851 > > > > > 90pct: 180.777 > > > > > Max: 190.265 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink and the > second results are for only shaping the downlink... > > > > > > > > > > and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and uplink > when I was testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I was > shaping it for the test. Am I doing it right ? > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht > wrote: > > > > > shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload only, the= n > measure. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias < > ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was trying to figur= e > out what > > > > > > should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw that the wndr380= 0 > tops out at > > > > > > 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As of now I have > it at 25/25 > > > > > > on the page. Is that right or should I just shape the upload? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that the= y > had > > > > > >> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizo= n-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down > > > > > >> > > > > > >> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we > start > > > > > >> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements ca= n > tell. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias < > ernestogelias@gmail.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > Hello everyone! > > > > > >> > I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went > back to the > > > > > >> > older > > > > > >> > submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer fo= r > it. But in > > > > > >> > my > > > > > >> > search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From wha= t > I seen > > > > > >> > about > > > > > >> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. > I'm just > > > > > >> > wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I hav= e > verizon > > > > > >> > fios > > > > > >> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much! > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > > > >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> Dave T=C3=A4ht > > > > > >> > > > > > >> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > > > > > > > > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > > > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --001a1139ca9a41c1f005061e3b19 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello again Sebastian,

this is the = output that i have gotten when entering the command and following your dire= ctions

ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bufferbloat$ date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ; ./netperf= -wrapper --ipv4 -L 300 -H net= perf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scaled --disable-Log -t netperf-wra= pper_test
Thu Oct 23 21:55:09 UTC 2014
PING kau.toke.dk (130.243.26.64) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes fro= m tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243= .26.64): icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_= seq=3D2 ttl=3D249 time=3D107 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D3 ttl=3D= 249 time=3D106 ms
64 bytes from = tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D4 ttl=3D249 time=3D106= ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.= kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D5 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 byte= s from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (13= 0.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D6 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): = icmp_seq=3D7 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D8 t= tl=3D249 time=3D106 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D9 ttl=3D249 time= =3D105 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-p= c.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D10 ttl=3D249 time=3D112 ms
=
--- kau.toke.dk ping statistics ---<= br>10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
rtt = min/avg/max/mdev =3D 105.529/106.794/112.146/1.870 ms
bash: ./netperf-wr= apper: Is a directory
ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bufferbloat$ date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ;= ./netperf-wrapper --ipv4 -L 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scaled --disable-Log -t n= etperf-wrapper_test
Thu Oct 23 21:57:19 UTC 2014
PING kau.toke.dk (130.243.26.64) 56(84) bytes of data.
64= bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.= 64): icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D249 time=3D106 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq= =3D3 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D4 ttl=3D249= time=3D105 ms
64 bytes from toh= ojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D5 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms=
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau= .se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D6 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 bytes f= rom tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.2= 43.26.64): icmp_seq=3D7 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icm= p_seq=3D8 ttl=3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D9 ttl= =3D249 time=3D105 ms
64 bytes from tohojo-pc.eki.kau.se (130.243.26.64): icmp_seq=3D10 ttl=3D249 time= =3D105 ms

--- kau.toke.dk ping st= atistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9= 015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev =3D 105.008/105.570/106.151/0.559 ms
bash:= ./netperf-wrapper: Is a directory



and this is the out= put of what you told me to put of what Dave recommended

ubuntu@ubunt= u:~/bufferbloat$ sudo apt-get install fping python-qt4 python-matplotlibReading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to= locate package fping
E: Unable to locate package python-matplotlib
<= /div>

On Wed, Oct = 22, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote= :
Hi Ernesto,



On Oct 22, 2014, at 21:39 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Sebastian, well I followed your directions and when I inputted t= he command git clone git at https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Oops, sorry, it looks I copy and pasted = the wrong line from my .bash_history=E2=80=A6 the following should work:
git clone https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper

also note Dave=E2=80=99s mail where he recommends:
sudo apt-get install fping python-qt4 python-matplotlib

to get more of the requirements for netperf-wrapper installed,=C2=A0 please= run this after coning the netperf-wrapper repository.

Thanks a lot=E2=80=A6

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Sebastian


>
> It said too many arguments...
> What do I do now?
>
> On Oct 21, 2014 4:23 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Ernesto,
>
> so I would recommend to first install git from a terminal in your ubun= tu virtual machine:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0sudo apt-get install git
>
> then create a directory where to store horse netperf-wrapper:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0mkdir -p ~/bufferbloat ; cd ~/bufferb= loat
>
> then clone the netperf-wrapper repository:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0git clone git@https://github.com/tohojo/= netperf-wrapper
>
> now you can test what is missing by calling:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0./netperf-wrapper
> this will most likely complain about missing components, please send t= he output of this command so we can take it from there.
>
> In the unexpected case that the above command just success please try:=
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net= ; ./netperf-wrapper --ipv4 -l 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scale= d --disable-log -t netperf-wrapper_test
>
> and again send the output=E2=80=A6
>
> And finally if all the above succeeds please try
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0./netperf-wrapper =E2=80=94gui
>
> and send the output
>
> Hope that helps...
>
> Best Regards
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Sebastian
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 04:30 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Alright Sebastian, I've managed to get the virtual box and Ub= untu running on the computer and I went to go see the packages I have no id= ea which one to install there's a whole lot of them. Forgive me this is= all new to me. Which one do I acquire and how to install it?
> >
> > On Oct 20, 2014 4:11 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Ernesto,
> >
> > On Oct 20, 2014, at 03:08 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Well Sebastian sir, I am taking your advice and I'm on w= indows 7 so right now I'm downloading virtualbox and xubuntu. I don'= ;t know if there is one that you guys recommend.
> >
> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0I only tested ubuntu 12.04LTS, b= ut certainly I would try the current 14.07 LTS today.
> >
> > >=C2=A0 Well... I am new to all this stuff so I'm asking y= ou to please help me on the subject like after everything is up and running= on the computer,
> >
> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Oh, sure I am happy to help you = with getting better data ;)
> >
> > > what other steps do I do afterwards and forgive me like I sa= id I'm new ot all this stuff because I want to be able to find my link = capacity when using SQM. and Thanks for the help!
> >
> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0First step is getting the vitali= zed linux up and running, then python 2.7 (I assume that python will be par= t of the distribution), with matplotlib; and finally netperf-wrapper. I ass= ume it might take a bit trying to figure out all the required packets insta= lled, but it should be reasonably quick to get this up and running=E2=80=A6= Just give it a try and let me know if/where you get stuck
> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0It would be most excellent if yo= u could document the whole procedure somehow so we could put it somewhere o= n the net to make it easier in the future...
> >
> > Best Regards
> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Sebastian
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Hi Ernesto,
> > >
> > > I would recommend to not run the netperf processes on the ro= uter you want to assess, if possible. Shaping at the rates you are interest= ed in probably will take 100% CPU of the router, so there is no slack for r= unning net server and netperf instances at the same time. Also I would reco= mmend to use netperf-wrapper (https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper) i= nstead of netperfrunner.sh as it allows so much nicer visualization of the = queueing over time. netperfrunner.sh is great tool for quick testing and fi= guring out link capacities and worst case latency under load increase (LULI= ), but for more thorough comparisons it ain=E2=80=99t made. Netperf-wrapper= will run under linux and macosx natively, but will also run (well enough) = in a linux virtual machine on a windows box.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Sebastian
> > >
> > >
> > > On Oct 19, 2014, at 21:16 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.s= h
> > > > 2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4= streams down a=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about = 60 seconds.
> > > >=C2=A0 Download:=C2=A0 30.49 Mbps
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Upload:=C2=A0 46.52 Mbps
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet l= oss)
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Min: 19.848
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A010pct: 19.958
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Median: 20.743
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Avg: 21.229
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A090pct: 22.739
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Max: 30.491
> > > > root@cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.s= h
> > > > 2014-10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4= streams down a=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about = 60 seconds.
> > > >=C2=A0 Download:=C2=A0 7.02 Mbps
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Upload:=C2=A0 63.68 Mbps
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet l= oss)
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Min: 21.690
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A010pct: 117.997
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Median: 153.983
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Avg: 150.851
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A090pct: 180.777
> > > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Max: 190.265
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink an= d the second results are for only shaping the downlink...
> > > >
> > > > and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and= uplink when I was testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I w= as shaping it for the test. Am I doing it right ?
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload= only, then measure.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wro= te:
> > > > > Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was tr= ying to figure out what
> > > > > should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw tha= t the wndr3800 tops out at
> > > > > 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As = of now I have it at 25/25
> > > > > on the page. Is that right or should I just shape = the upload?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" <= ;dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:<= br> > > > > >>
> > > > >> On at least one verizon device I've tried = it appeared that they had
> > > > >> SFQ or something similar on egress from the mo= dem.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RR= UL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So you only needed to shape the download. whic= h is good as we start
> > > > >> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only= measurements can tell.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elia= s <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > Hello everyone!
> > > > >> > I have a question about the wndr3800 rout= ing limit. I went back to the
> > > > >> > older
> > > > >> > submissions to see if I can find what wou= ld be the answer for it. But in
> > > > >> > my
> > > > >> > search I haven't managed to find a de= finite answer. From what I seen
> > > > >> > about
> > > > >> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 5= 0, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just
> > > > >> > wondering if anyone can shed some light f= or me here as I have verizon
> > > > >> > fios
> > > > >> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you = guys very much!
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > _________________________________________= ______
> > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/lis= tinfo/cerowrt-devel
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Dave T=C3=A4ht
> > > > >>
> > > > >> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/p= rojects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dave T=C3=A4ht
> > > >
> > > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/b= loat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > > > = Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-= devel
> > >
> > >
> >
>


--001a1139ca9a41c1f005061e3b19--