Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
To: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] [Bloat] Latest codel, fq_codel, and pie sim study from cablelabs now available
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 14:59:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA_e5Z6H8E-6Oy8gxTmo7FaK4M=pPy8n_AZjopyRMyTCgaDswg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5181CD56.9050501@superduper.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1895 bytes --]

It is quite reasonable for edge devices to not use SFQ but actual FQ with
one queue per flow (and some reasonable garbage collection heuristic).  Or
to use a few thousand queues.

Most of the time connection tracking will be enabled on an edge router
anyway, so the device is paying that overhead already.  May as well use it.


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net> wrote:

> Or one could use more queues in SFQ, so that the chance of 2 streams
> sharing a queue is small. Even perhaps use a different strategy than
> hashing to distribute traffic to queues, although whatever strategy is used
> needs to be resistant to DoS attacks. Or one could classify the VoIP
> traffic and prioritise that. Another possibility is a heuristic approach -
> don't mix long lived bulk data streams in the same bucket as others.
>
> Simon
>
>
> On Wed 01 May 2013 05:00:27 PM PDT, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
>>
>> On 1 May, 2013, at 11:26 pm, Simon Barber wrote:
>>
>>  Interesting to note that sfq-codel's reaction to a non conforming flow
>>> is of course to start dropping more aggressively to make it conform,
>>> leading to the high loss rates for whatever is hashed together with a VoIP
>>> flow that does not reduce it's bandwidth.
>>>
>>> One downside to SFQ really.
>>>
>>
>> The only real solution, for the scenario where this happens, would be to
>> somehow identify all the BitTorrent traffic and stuff it into a single
>> bucket, where it has to compete on equal terms with the single VoIP flow.
>>  The big unanswered question is then: can this realistically be done?  Does
>> BitTorrent traffic get marked as the bulk, low priority traffic it is, for
>> example?
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/**listinfo/codel<https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2688 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-02  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-01 11:23 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2013-05-01 20:26 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Simon Barber
2013-05-02  0:00   ` Jonathan Morton
2013-05-02  2:20     ` Simon Barber
2013-05-02  4:59       ` Andrew McGregor [this message]
2013-05-02 12:04       ` Jonathan Morton
2013-05-14  2:26         ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] " Dan Siemon
2013-05-14  4:56           ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Codel] " Tristan Seligmann
2013-05-14 10:24             ` Dave Taht
2013-05-14 13:02               ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] [Bloat] " Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 18:19             ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [Codel] " Michael Richardson
2013-05-14 12:12           ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] [Bloat] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-06 17:54       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-06 18:46         ` Jonathan Morton
2013-05-06 20:47           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-05-07 16:22             ` Greg White
2013-05-07 13:31       ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Michael Richardson
2013-05-07 16:30         ` Greg White
2013-05-07 19:56           ` Wes Felter
2013-05-07 20:30             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-08 22:25               ` Dave Taht
2013-05-08 22:54                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-09  1:45                   ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] " Andrew McGregor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA_e5Z6H8E-6Oy8gxTmo7FaK4M=pPy8n_AZjopyRMyTCgaDswg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andrewmcgr@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=simon@superduper.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox