From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com (mail-oa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6850921F2C7 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 09:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o6so1095226oag.22 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:04:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Bjo/G46HPPBujpEh+VIAE1avtVFQc98gMJ2cmevDAt4=; b=HKnv/A5UYXHbGnhGz+HpTHebLNnM5XjLBBt/m9EXBqTveax2qVWo1W1rMSANssLfyA hJu7BN0fdWjB8reTkwAeahSCA6y2Jm/oM491kRpohdThJCEKYnz3rRzuBJpuWP9DUhe3 APA+F9rg0P/jvqeJlvZI78Pq3oYg5U8OrjhKQaRv+wdQ5h8rywjP5DMovwMgHUu1YbxJ vIGC2sOZRSYUi6Nift4RYbJsiVvkz7GiV4ZVvP3I+vWzbwk5LFcDeY0dLa7DL8dUcCzE zmzAtlNOF/Dmzh6B2qnYfp6arv49XCCnzTV+ZOyuH3Jp0KkfhnWId/FzWU4etD85rN8O sMzw== X-Received: by 10.60.175.163 with SMTP id cb3mr7861858oec.29.1402070682341; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:04:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.137.162 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 09:04:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dane Medic Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 18:04:22 +0200 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd75f24f89be404fb2d04cb Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Secure ad-hoc interface X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:04:43 -0000 --047d7bd75f24f89be404fb2d04cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not sure which of this patches -> https://github.com/opentechinstitute/commotion-router/tree/master/patches but commotion wireless guys have a working adhoc with wpa2 2014-06-06 17:53 GMT+02:00 Dave Taht : > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Dane Medic wrote: > > Hi, > > > > are there any plans to add WPA encryption on ibss interface in cerowrt? > > Not clear what you mean. adhoc doesn't work with wpa, so far as I know. > > I HAVE long thought that shipping with wpa enabled on the main interfaces > was probably a good idea, but what I'd like in that case is to mandate th= at > the wpa keys, ssid, and root password be changed on first install, > actually. > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > NSFW: > https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_inde= cent.article > --047d7bd75f24f89be404fb2d04cb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
but commotion wireless guys have a working adhoc with wpa2
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">

2014-06-06 17:= 53 GMT+02:00 Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:53= PM, Dane Medic <dm70dm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any plans to add WPA encryption on ibss interface in cerowrt= ?

Not clear what you mean. adhoc doesn't work with wpa, so far as I= know.

I HAVE long thought that shipping with wpa enabled on the main interfaces was probably a good idea, but what I'd like in that case is to mandate = that
the wpa keys, ssid, and root password be changed on first install, actually= .

>
>
> Cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@l= ists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorshi= p/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article

--047d7bd75f24f89be404fb2d04cb--