From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bitkraft@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B20D21F2E0
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sat, 24 May 2014 21:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z60so10260359qgd.23
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sat, 24 May 2014 21:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=GLWPtRW8gzF7MPkWxDxiLmf8TPWwyudkiVV1tMSUsuw=;
	b=WHrnq6JzqbvLMTihgefp6jZzeLRwF2rhvLKpxRzzELK4y4gxStufmCZICmpSJ4l2tw
	b73KNnUxcsPNawuyL/ddsOBba8yYlR91nzv1siH50cX84gpa0bjdjqRJmNJ8lwcWqijF
	Bl1OcCc4RvTHOpF6gj06LMYEtYaYoJ65Szey9DQJMarhPYNWW+5SCLcPOPflonYgQmZx
	T6aNvSbrcvHdzVTpPTR4igqNiEAX9GkoHfd4jvYOohsy8sTcQjemvNL26oj1CLOe+bd/
	W4O+s1MuaBhqhjXLFnWnR1qmoEsug40HMlFxh82ZyJuqXOi/uFONV26LDH7Uu8osBVpi
	tjSg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.49.67 with SMTP id u3mr21107981qaf.63.1400993734126;
	Sat, 24 May 2014 21:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.29.4 with HTTP; Sat, 24 May 2014 21:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 21:55:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CABxQXNnZVq2f3xkfuP9VtZJC+u5PvuPmGiPNp82=M3MZRZLsJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Spade <bitkraft@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ef80daf03b04fa3245d2
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] 802.11e
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 04:55:35 -0000

--001a11c2ef80daf03b04fa3245d2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Greetings,

In Jim's post Traditional AQM is not Enough!:

http://gettys.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/low-latency-requires-smart-queuing-traditional-aqm-is-not-enough/#more-1091

He mentions that Dave found 802.11e queues might not working.  Are there
more details on this?

Thanks
Brian

--001a11c2ef80daf03b04fa3245d2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Greetings,<div><br></div><div>In Jim&#39;s post Traditiona=
l AQM is not Enough!:</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://gettys.wor=
dpress.com/2013/07/10/low-latency-requires-smart-queuing-traditional-aqm-is=
-not-enough/#more-1091">http://gettys.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/low-latency-=
requires-smart-queuing-traditional-aqm-is-not-enough/#more-1091</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div>He mentions that Dave found 802.11e queues might =
not working. =C2=A0Are there more details on this? =C2=A0</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>Thanks</div><div>Brian</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>

--001a11c2ef80daf03b04fa3245d2--