From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ve0-x230.google.com (mail-ve0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0753201299 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id pa12so379810veb.7 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:05:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lG/hToSFuvr0sBXxAjgTTy6Nt6y+uGb0qwjAhbC6tIA=; b=YNkwx0aCW2sW3VOAxGwQeMXGSET+5YIDvyP3KE67ae71mH5+uQnb0hRYznJgfa04UD 6xUY61CA47jglcTZM8BhMMqjA/N3RY1OpMzQD8YXczxQiMF5/d1MJ4/G4TGCYPXNJk4m B6jukSPvDxw94rj5FxZX0bjo2Adc/PC4xo08WB8Efp6D6V3enhllOrk3RzgxcChk8Y4T Sc4kiv67Y+2cMGsnmfQ3/finVe+0GFsbqvae/OscI/bpNO7KBOOgSU1/dREiOQ54YcCU Ml93YgqrtnIZIycFDHzCYz6yn5yq1WXZAfjUftt5LiJ1Lzk26d68lB7i17TPaJUcG86h PJsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.191.134 with SMTP id dm6mr12669800vcb.16.1393247148019; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:05:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: c3reszcecc22@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.196.210 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:05:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <530B4109.2060202@gmail.com> References: <20140223172140.GB24483@lists.bufferbloat.net> <530A4791.8080903@ashtonfam.org> <128185AE-918F-4944-BB45-B5D20A1AD1E5@gmx.de> <530B1C8C.90100@imap.cc> <530B2703.3000505@imap.cc> <530B3F03.4010208@imap.cc> <530B4109.2060202@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:05:47 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d7jpu2ucKhVV2KMGmFO8ZSeJjbc Message-ID: From: Vincent Frentzel To: Robert Bradley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158a82a57966604f326a1b6 Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] saner defaults for config/firewall X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:05:49 -0000 --089e0158a82a57966604f326a1b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Robert. I indeed had enable_vlan4k in the network. Will definitely try to remove this. When you enable the vlan do you use the eth0.1, eth0.2, etc.. stanza for the interface or se00? Is se00 an alias for eth0.1? On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Robert Bradley wrote: > On 24/02/2014 12:45, Fred Stratton wrote: > > There are no button presses to bring the box back, as you can with some > TP-Link routers. > > You could use a serial lead if you opened the case. No one has mentioned > trying this with cero on the list. > > > In my experience, reflashing via TFTP tends to work well in terms of > resetting the configuration. > > As an aside, I've noticed that occasionally I get an "enable_vlan4k" > sneaking into /etc/config/network if I've looked at the vlan page. If that > happens, the wired LAN breaks. Perhaps it's worth checking that first via > the wireless link? > > -- > Robert Bradley > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --089e0158a82a57966604f326a1b6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Robert.

I indeed had enable_vlan= 4k in the network. Will definitely try to remove this. When you enable the = vlan do you use the eth0.1, eth0.2, etc.. stanza for the interface or se00?= Is se00 an alias for eth0.1?


On Mon,= Feb 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Robert Bradley <robert.bradley1@gmail.co= m> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
On 24/02/2014 12:45, Fred Stratton wrote:
=20 There are no button presses to bring the box back, as you can with some TP-Link routers.

You could use a serial lead if you opened the case. No one has mentioned trying this with cero on the list.


In my experience, reflashing via TFTP tends to work well in terms of resetting the configuration.

As an aside, I've noticed that occasionally I get an "enable_v= lan4k" sneaking into /etc/config/network if I've looked at the vlan page.= =C2=A0 If that happens, the wired LAN breaks.=C2=A0 Perhaps it's worth che= cking that first via the wireless link?
--=20
Robert Bradley

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


--089e0158a82a57966604f326a1b6--