From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C07121F51E for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 17:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w61so3567472wes.40 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 17:55:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xJTVTxogcwsmnaWdXKxzv5d6Rmu0tY1In9SyBlOxH0o=; b=j6PjCAygNZ6fwIxrIRJkd+ZTHrT/s+wy9/AYTshoBc4T1VmnvNcVuSRg8CwoLdogUN Nsgh1IA31xAAK+FoAsJxcPMsbk7t+7nvAj4ewmhHre7KE6+wvtt9hLgbhd3EP+cunzb5 0PG2HW5EUSrXeEPAclxS/cfkuUUX8ZYAwejooJE8G7fjndtrLFFFbXuSWVl7cmq6/tbZ g2spnYia7qc8N/DoyF+sI4ttH2101vjylNfXLOfQBDiJUGzMsJ9XzruzeF+wSLzlWTVr 6K3RNu8auhUel9AKm3dPWJ6Csl71PBAmIEYiF6RS/dWBhW+3Cj+RZRtuDWVRnUdQV9to Btzw== X-Received: by 10.180.189.76 with SMTP id gg12mr10401934wic.28.1401584113933; Sat, 31 May 2014 17:55:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.217.55.1 with HTTP; Sat, 31 May 2014 17:54:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "R." Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:54:53 -0400 Message-ID: To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SIP ATA device trouble over wireless Ethernet bridge [NAT-related?] X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:55:16 -0000 Well, it seems like issuing this command on boot-up (in rc.local) fixed the issue: /etc/init.d/firewall restart; I tested it on a defaulted Cero firewall configuration. Seems like it triggered the right stuff? Will report back if it breaks again. On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:17 PM, R. wrote: > My setup is the following: > > Cable modem <- Netgear WNDR3800=C2=B9 <- Linksys WRT54GL=C2=B2 <- Linksys > PAP2T-NA (SIP ATA device) <- Phone > > > While running OpenWRT, the setup was working fine. The ATA was > connecting/registering without a problem. It does NAT-traversal and > has STUN enabled. > > While running CeroWRT, the setup has had many hiccups. I read on the > Wiki=C2=B3 that Cero might have NAT disabled by default. > I tried many different firewall settings to get it working, without > success. I've tried putting everything on "accept", "masquerading"=3DON > everywhere, and tried assigning ge00 to all possible (default) zones. > > Any ideas as to what could be causing this? > > > =C2=B9 Running Cerowrt 3.10.40-6 > =C2=B2 Running Tomato > =C2=B3 "CeroWrt is a test platform, and as such we wanted it to co-exist > within existing networks as best as possible, without conflicting with > an existing network, and to not require NAT in order to function > inside that network. NAT skews some test results horribly."