From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com (mail-we0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB65621F1CF for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q58so13561700wes.19 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:50:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mNQtYUAh1zndY7zQkd8dsspDTCyxveRiQBERX3ZM06Q=; b=FAstdQHmexD/hj+0aVfGLeVAUuw2BOcepPw5q1wtjgxpj2RjIOW+HUTYFxajwRYE8E bjE+jkFrQwDUecV2jOoV2eXz0dkg/myhu4JHxaPVwmXe+Mt2cXCzLIClp8IpDeSoXG6Z ZRZWF8fk6gVSkQyuazkQImNwLbeF7qY5ng6lvFpapEUcpY1nS8l44GA/VY3EL6iFuo6y MYvlAWyS4E274Zwjvi2naLxC/jkanQ2BA5SrFHsIuFaGDb7TJKXXCBDBdWpsMiq6BmXu AwxwAaqkOPa4wAwnfzVIw6UT+IPZTezJN2GxTPbLihwjUgmbs9bMvZc6ZEMMCr/w28gA Ncug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.39.43 with SMTP id m11mr2608250wik.8.1388767843025; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:50:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.58.133 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:50:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:50:42 -0800 Message-ID: From: "cb.list6" To: Dave Taht Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134cdd8f58b9404ef13b5fe Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 6relayd X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:50:53 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:50:53 -0000 --001a1134cdd8f58b9404ef13b5fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > At one level I am happy to figure out this is a recently introduced bug. > > On the other hand I am not sure if it is 6relayd. > > What version of cero was working for you? > I am not entirely sure, but i think it was from September. CB > On Jan 3, 2014 12:21 AM, "cb.list6" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have been using CeroWRT on Comcast with a 3800 for about 6 month. The >> DHCP-PD config has always been a little unstable for me, but working. >> >> I recently upgraded to: >> >> root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a >> Linux cerowrt 3.10.24 #1 Tue Dec 24 10:50:15 PST 2013 mips GNU/Linux >> >> My WAN gets a /128, but i cannot get DHCP-PD to work to get addresses on >> the rest of my interfaces. The router does seem to have good IPv6 access. >> >> >> I fiddled with the 6relayd config and came up with this, but it does not >> work. Any pointers on how to get this back on track? The result of the >> below config is that the /128 from the WAN interfaces is now present on all >> the interfaces but my attached computers get no addresses. >> >> >> config server 'default' >> option rd 'server' >> option dhcpv6 'server' >> option management_level '1' >> list network 'ge01' >> list network 'gw00' >> list network 'gw01' >> list network 'gw10' >> list network 'gw11' >> list network 'se00' >> list network 'sw00' >> list network 'sw10' >> option fallback_relay 'rd dhcpv6 ndp' >> option master 'ge00' >> >> root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> --001a1134cdd8f58b9404ef13b5fe Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

At one level I am happy to fi= gure out this is a recently introduced bug.

On the other hand I am not sure if it is 6relayd.

What version of cero was working for you?


On Jan 3, 2014 12:21 AM, = "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I have been usin= g CeroWRT on=20 Comcast with a 3800 for about 6 month.=A0 The DHCP-PD config has always=20 been a little unstable for me, but working.

I recently upgrade= d to:

=A0root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a
Linux cerowrt 3.10.24 #1 Tue D= ec 24 10:50:15 PST 2013 mips GNU/Linux

My WAN gets a /128, but i cannot get DHCP-PD to work to get addresses on=20 the rest of my interfaces.=A0 The router does seem to have good IPv6=20 access.=A0


I fiddled with the 6relayd config and came up with=20 this, but it does not work.=A0 Any pointers on how to get this back on=20 track?=A0 The result of the below config is that the /128 from the WAN=20 interfaces is now present on all the interfaces but my attached=20 computers get no addresses.


config server 'default'
=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 option rd 'server'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 option = dhcpv6 'server'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 option management_level &#= 39;1'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'ge01'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'gw00'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = list network 'gw01'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'gw10= '
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'gw11'
=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0 list network 'se00'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network= 'sw00'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'sw10'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = option fallback_relay 'rd dhcpv6 ndp'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 opti= on master 'ge00'

root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Ce= rowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel


--001a1134cdd8f58b9404ef13b5fe--