From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <white.phoenix@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0B321F5CD
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbeb7 with SMTP id eb7so85597278obb.3
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=KYNMOMkw73c3tjBONpkQtSEWZBw6UA4Vmd+CtUTeIwk=;
	b=J8B8V8+A7kUWTUUsCJovnJ5qHeBodi0OwqYyUabQ9fFjlFbhxpZ+yMU1wFbKgR3Vc1
	AlHqHfdCL7yepVmEFZHwB2JVuu5wg9zqJBT3L0w3oJ7jZA/CnWfvUqKzMKkqfC7NjWlz
	TDRwGlViGjpvk5tekQtP/4C/obsF+U2F/S6/eb4CElgg0EdKkM1g+B61kMLU2G6Mo+Ha
	F0+l5C9tlewnuuZlWxPNm0U1q/EWtrfURkXHejTtkPB6zHHDujF0lRsf7VlpTZTlcR+H
	anXMz4dPLM3YeveExnli/wpNd4YCEFYrxOrm4xMomGvzXxOmCIJaiauLcm9KBO0cFbiN
	TBxg==
X-Received: by 10.182.246.163 with SMTP id xx3mr5979451obc.83.1429337241519;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: white.phoenix@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.188.8 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: leetminiwheat <LeetMiniWheat@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 02:06:51 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9B6mBnQa5BP8TsybfxJDO0nkbwQ
Message-ID: <CAGHZhqGLELXFSOtZVToMz2X=AnZrwsn_wgx-qJDug-3H0+U1sQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] ath9k WMM not obeying DSCP/TOS flags?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:07:51 -0000

I've tried, to no avail, to get certain traffic to go to the BK and VO
queues via DSCP and/or TOS mangling (with HTB+fq_codel egress/ingress
DSCP stripping/squashing turned OFF, i.e. flags enabled).

Is this a known issue? Or intentional behavior? Or something
misconfigured in qdiscs? Shoving tons of traffic down wifi which
should be DSCP/TOS flagged for BK or VO only puts it in VI or BE from
what I can tell from /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/queues and
/sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/queues

I've tried -j DSCP --set-dscp xxx in mangle PRE/POST and I see the
MARKing going on in QOS_MARK_$IFACE zone(s), so the traffic is clearly
getting marked for QoS bins

A wireless "expert" friend of mine was saying a lot of WMM issues
weren't fixed until kernel 3.17-3.18?

WMM seems particularly useful for mobile devices and/or crowded
airspace, so I'd like to somehow get this working right.