From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F7521F2C0 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 18:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 142so3423667ykq.16 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 18:15:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZylBOpNr7nZC1O65Gzo4ZOr7/hMCwEZQhULCHguBOJE=; b=Xm3Dn7lAstiOs9qJrmCPjpcu/Vjp8Whz6soXHWLKOhXwU6xsXKAXCb9fNFAHjm7Lwx 2nEo6n832iZ7+7dIbaWIStCV9RWrIhquBwyiEbPqwUFO7PeAs3CFHE0SoYWCLRxXReRO h0qMtt7Jlb/SgpuHnIx18eHLXvLUORSb5Ihr4EhIHauEmNltqDM0PMGjAhS7muAqIznP 9xFiXpy+ob6ffsM4+FhcX9bO3GExlHjpz49ZVF5C82thGmWMwF6tfKIcAGo3z72SFed/ z2W+t3nEge4QkxtsacK5MV4hhtVXebAwmXrQUiK18/ysqd02bq6nSRiEj7t2j58B3Uk9 faaQ== X-Received: by 10.236.61.45 with SMTP id v33mr39637437yhc.20.1400375745507; Sat, 17 May 2014 18:15:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: white.phoenix@gmail.com Received: by 10.170.114.208 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2014 18:15:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <18393.1400309683@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <18393.1400309683@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Aristar Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 21:15:15 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bOzsk2BF1NrUfF61ToKqTl3pl9o Message-ID: To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] A stable cerowrt release in sight X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 01:15:47 -0000 I also have one thing to add, the "associated stations" hasn't been working properly in LUCI, it only shows the master station instead of the clients connected like it used to in 3.7.5, not sure who's to blame here. Can others confirm this? Not a huge deal, but thought I might throw this out there anyways. On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:54 AM, wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2014 23:36:11 -0700, Dave Taht said: > >> So hopefully the upcoming 3.10.40-4 build will be stable enough to >> freeze on. If there is anything else that people want done before >> freezing, let me know soonest. > > Upgraded just fine for me, been running for several hours on a wndr3800 without > any big problems. > > Minor nit 1: It doesn't seem to save the 'Start UPNP now' setting, so that's > something I need to re-set each time I upgrade. Seems to have been this way > for a long time, 3.10.32-9 did it to me too. My PS3 says UPNP works once > I start it. > > Minor nit 2: It grants IPv4 leases for 24 hours, but IPv6 for only 1 hour. > That's OK - except my laptop running Fedora seems to think the lease is for 24 > hours, not 1, so the lease ends up expiring. Haven't chased this to see who's > to blame. It's not a show stopper for me, because my laptop's > SLAAC-autoconfigured address and RFC3041 privacy addresses keep working anyhow. > It's probably been as long as the other one, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >